7 7 2 5 8

论文已发表


注册即可获取德孚的最新动态



IF 收录期刊





更多详情 >>



作者优惠计划

Favored Author Program


很高兴为我们的作者提供一种切实的方法以支持开放获取,并鼓励教师和研究人员通过开放获取模式,尽可能广泛地推广他们的作品。


作者优惠计划的成员将获得:


文章发表费(APC) 10% 的折扣


这 10% 的折扣从您加入 “作者优惠计划” 之时开始,并将适用于之后提交的所有论文



*若要加入“作者优惠计划”,您需要已经在德孚医药出版社发表过论文,或为我们进行过同行评审。作者必须在提交论文之前注册该优惠计划,折扣不能追溯应用于已提交的论文




更多详情 >>



已发表论文

华中地区不孕症患者应对方式相关因素分析

 

Authors Mao J, Guo H, Wang J, Li Y, Xu M

Received 16 March 2022

Accepted for publication 14 June 2022

Published 2 July 2022 Volume 2022:16 Pages 1605—1612

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S364345

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Naifeng Liu

Objective: To investigate the psychosocial factors, including personality characteristics, coping style, social support and alexithymia of infertile patients, and explore the relevant factors regarding the medical coping style choice of infertile patients in central China.
Methods: Sixty infertile patients in the reproductive medicine centre in our hospital were investigated using a self-made general situation questionnaire; internal control, powerful others and opportunities scale; social support rating scale; and medical coping questionnaire, and the data was analysed.
Results: Of the 60 infertile patients, 57 (95%) were female, with an average age of 27.85 ± 14.52 years old, and 42 (70%) had secondary infertility. The score of the face dimension was lower than the norm (19.17 ± 2.18 vs 19.43 ± 3.82, P = 0.012), and those of the avoidance (15.98 ± 2.43 vs 14.41 ± 2. 94, P = 0.030) and yield (9.48 ± 3.19 vs 8.83 ± 3.19, P = 0.012) dimensions were higher than the norm. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that internal control and the utilisation of support were influencing factors for the coping style (R2 = 0.271, adjusted R2 = 0.144, F = 9.827, < 0.001), and internal control was the influencing factor for the avoidance coping style (R2 = 0.024, adjusted R2 = 0.021, F = 3.363, = 0.014). The education level, opportunity and utilisation of support factors influenced the yield dimension (R2 = 0.087, adjusted R2 = 0.076, F = 7.749, < 0.001).
Conclusion: Considering the association between the coping styles and psychosocial factors, it was recommended to formulate targeted intervention strategies based on these influencing factors to guide patients to adopt positive coping styles and achieve good outcomes.
Keywords: infertility, coping style, psychosocial factors, relevance