已发表论文

从活动耐受性、患者所反映的疗效和满意度来评价肺脏导引法 (Pulmonary Daoyin, PD) 对慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 患者的有效性

 

Authors Zhang H, Li J, Yu X, Li S, Halmurat U, Xie Y, Wang YF, Li F, Wang M

Received 18 July 2016

Accepted for publication 30 May 2017

Published 4 August 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 2333—2342

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S117461

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Charles Downs

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell

Background and objective: Pulmonary Daoyin (PD) (evolved from ancient Chinese daoyin skills), is a rehabilitation technology that combines specially designed movements of the arms and body and controlled breathing exercises, to improve the physiological and psychological status of patients with chronic respiratory disease. Pulmonary rehabilitation is effective for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the efficacy of PD is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a PD program in enhancing activity tolerance, patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with the effectiveness on patients with COPD. 
Materials and methods: The multi-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2011 to June 2012 in local communities in cities of the 11 research centers in China. It included COPD patients (moderate to very severe) who were recruited from an outpatient clinic. A randomized controlled study included 464 COPD patients who were randomly allocated either to the PD group, participating in a 3-month, ten times-weekly supervised PD-based pulmonary rehabilitation program, or to a control group continuing with regular medical treatment alone. Data were gathered using the 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test, COPD patient-reported outcomes (COPD-PRO) and Effectiveness Satisfaction Questionnaire for COPD (ESQ-COPD), which was filled out at baseline and 3 months post-intervention. SAS 9.2 was used for statistical analysis.
Results: Of the 464 patients in the study, 461 were included in the full analysis set (FAS); 429 were in the per-protocol analysis set (PPS). After 3-month intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups in 6MWD (FAS; =0.049; PPS; =0.041), total score and all domains of COPD-PRO (FAS; =0.014; PPS; =0.003) and ESQ-COPD (FAS; =0.038; PPS; <0.001).
Conclusions: The PD program was able to improve the activity tolerance level and satisfaction of COPD patients because of its effectiveness.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary rehabilitation, pulmonary daoyin, patient reported outcomes, effectiveness satisfaction, 6-minute walking distance