已发表论文

结合临床因素、常规超声检查和超声增强超声检查特征在术前预测不同大小乳头状甲状腺癌中央淋巴结转移中的价值

 

Authors Wang Y, Nie F, Wang G, Liu T, Dong T, Sun Y

Received 30 December 2020

Accepted for publication 11 March 2021

Published 19 April 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 3403—3415

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S299157

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Bilikere Dwarakanath

Purpose: Early and accurate preoperative diagnosis of central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is crucial to improve surgical management of patients with clinical lymph node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Towards improving diagnosis of CLNM, we assessed the value of combining preoperative clinical characteristics, conventional ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in preoperative prediction of CLNM of different sized PTCs.
Patients and Methods: Patients were divided according to tumor size: a PTC group (> 10 mm) and a papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) group (≤ 10 mm). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and ultrasonographic features of 120 PTC patients and 165 PTMC patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen independent risk factors and establish prediction models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the best cut-off values for continuous variables and assess the performance of prediction models.
Results: Independent risk predictors of CLNM for the PTC group were extrathyroidal extension in CEUS (OR=7.923), tumor size > 14 mm (OR=5.491), and multifocality (OR=3.235). For the PTMC group, the independent risk factors were the distance from the thyroid capsule =0 mm (OR=4.629), male (OR=3.315), tumor size > 5 mm (OR=3.304), and microcalcification (OR=2.560). The predictive model of combined method had better performance in predicting CLNM of PTC compared with models based on CEUS and conventional ultrasound alone (area under the curve: 0.832 vs 0.739, =0.0011; 0.832 vs 0.678, =0.0012). For PTMC, comparing with CEUS, the combined method and conventional ultrasound performed better than CEUS alone in predicting CLNM (area under the curve: 0.783 vs 0.636, =0.0016; 0.738 vs 0.636, =0.0196).
Conclusion: The predictive models of combined method obtained from significant preoperative clinical and ultrasonographic features can potentially improve the preoperative diagnosis and individual treatment of CLNM in patients with PTC and PTMC. CEUS may be helpful in predicting CLNM of PTC, but CEUS would be ineffective in predicting CLNM of PTMC.
Keywords: papillary thyroid carcinoma, lymph node metastasis, prophylactic central neck dissection, ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound