已发表论文

磷霉素、利福平、万古霉素、达托霉素单独及联合应用对万古霉素耐药肠球菌的体外抗菌活性

 

Authors Tong J, Jiang Y, Xu H, Jin X, Zhang L, Ying S, Yu W, Qiu Y

Received 22 April 2021

Accepted for publication 27 June 2021

Published 12 July 2021 Volume 2021:15 Pages 3049—3055

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S315061

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jianbo Sun

Purpose: The emergence of vancomycin resistant Enterococci  (VRE) is shortening the choices for clinical anti-infective therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of vancomycin resistance and evaluate the effect of fosfomycin (FM), rifampin (RIF), vancomycin (VAN), linezolid (LNZ), daptomycin (DAP) alone or in combination against VRE.
Methods: Eight VRE isolates were collected. A total of 18 antibiotics susceptibility tests were further done for VRE. Whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis were performed. The effect of FM, RIF, VNA, LNZ, DAP alone or in combination was determined using anti-biofilm testing and the time-kill assay.
Results: All isolates were susceptible to LNZ and DPA. The high-level resistance determinant of VAN in these strains was due to VanA-type cassette. MLST revealed two different STs for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium  (VREm) and four different STs for vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis  (VREs). Virulence genes in VREs were more than VREm, especially for 4942 isolated from blood. Gene acm  and uppS  were only identified in VREm, while virulence genes related to cytolysin were only found in E. faecalis. Further in vitro studies indicated FM (83 mg/L) combined with DAP (20.6 mg/L) and DAP monotherapy (47.1 mg/L) had bactericidal effect against VRE isolates at 24h.
Conclusion: High-level resistance determinant of VAN in tested isolates was due to VanA-type cassette. FM combined with DAP is a potential therapeutic option for VRE infections.
Keywords: vancomycin, daptomycin, combination therapy, biofilm