论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
D-二聚体对 AECOPD 住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的 Padua 预测评分的优越预测价值:一项多中心队列研究
Authors Zhou C, Guang Y, Luo Y, Ge H, Wei H, Liu H, Zhang J, Pan P, Zhang J, Peng L , Aili A, Liu Y, Pu J, Zhong X, Wang Y, Yi Q , Zhou H
Received 7 July 2022
Accepted for publication 30 September 2022
Published 21 October 2022 Volume 2022:17 Pages 2711—2722
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S380418
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell
Background: The optimal tool for risk prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate whether D-dimer could predict the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD compared to the Padua Prediction Score (PPS).
Methods: Inpatients with AECOPD were prospectively enrolled from seven medical centers in China between December 2018 and June 2020. On admission, D-dimer was detected, PPS was calculated for each patient, and the incidence of 2-month VTE was investigated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of D-dimer and PPS on VTE development, and the best cut-off value for both methods was evaluated through the Youden index.
Results: Among the 4468 eligible patients with AECOPD, 90 patients (2.01%) developed VTE within 2 months after admission. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of D-dimer for predicting VTE were significantly higher than those of the PPS both in the overall cohort (0.724, 95% CI 0.672– 0.776 vs 0.620, 95% CI 0.562– 0.679; P< 0.05) and the subgroup of patients without thromboprophylaxis (0.747, 95% CI 0.695– 0.799 vs 0.640, 95% CI 0.582– 0.698; P< 0.05). By calculating the Youden Index, the best cut-off value of D-dimer was determined to be 0.96 mg/L with an AUC of 0.689, which was also significantly better than that of the PPS with the best cut-off value of 2 (AUC 0.581, P=0.007). After the combination of D-dimer with PPS, the AUC (0.621) failed to surpass D-dimer alone (P=0.104).
Conclusion: D-dimer has a superior predictive value for VTE over PPS in inpatients with AECOPD, which might be a better choice to guide thromboprophylaxis in inpatients with AECOPD due to its effectiveness and convenience.
Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trail Registry NO. ChiCTR2100044625; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=121626.
Keywords: acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inpatients, D-dimer, Padua Prediction Score, venous thromboembolism