已发表论文

与异基因造血干细胞移植相比,猪抗淋巴细胞球蛋白、环孢素A和血小板生成素受体激动剂在再生障碍性贫血患者中的疗效和存活率相似

 

Authors Zhao R, Ji D, Zhou Y, Qi L, Li F 

Received 17 May 2024

Accepted for publication 2 August 2024

Published 13 September 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 4025—4036

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S465184

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor David E. Stec

Ran Zhao,1,* Dexiang Ji,1,* Yulan Zhou,1,2 Ling Qi,1,2 Fei Li1,2 

1Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Hematological Diseases, Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China; 2Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Fei Li, Email yx021021@sina.com

Background: Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with horse or rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (h-/r-ATG) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are two baseline treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) and transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) patients. Addition of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to standard IST therapy (h-/r-ATG) has greatly improved the survival of SAA, whereas porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin (p-ALG) combined with TPO-RAs still had a matter of debate.
Methods: We retrospectively compared the data of 48 AA patients in our center between 2020 and 2022, 23 AA patients received with p-ALG ± TPO-RAs, 25 AA patients underwent matched sibling donor (MSD-) or haploidentical (haplo-) HSCT.
Results: For patients in the HSCT group, the ORR was 90.9% which was significantly higher than that in the IST±TPO-RAs group (45.5%, P = 0.001) at 3 months; moreover, patients who underwent HSCT achieved faster transfusion independence, better CR rate, shorter time of recovery normal blood routine, and the percentage of normal blood routine (all P < 0.05) compared with IST±TPO-RAs group. However, the ORR were similary at 6 months in the two groups (95.5% vs 81.8% P = 0.342), with a median follow up of 19.8 months (range, 0.3– 38.2 months), the 2-year FFS and OS in the two cohorts has no different. Subgroup analysis further indicated that the 2-year FFS and OS were similar between IST+TPO-RAs and haplo-HSCT subgroups, as well as in IST+TPO-RAs and MSD-HSCT cohorts. Moreover, the first-time hospitalizations were much more expensive in the HSCT group than in the IST±TPO-RAs group (402 756 vs. 292 902 yuan, P = 0.002).
Conclusion: P-ALG-based-IST±TPO-RAs is a good treatment option with similar FFS and OS compared to allo- HSCT for AA patients without the opportunity of HSCT.

Keywords: porcine anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin, thrombopoietin receptor agonist, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, aplastic anemia