已发表论文

比较两种隐球菌抗原检测方法的性能:化学发光法与胶体金法

 

Authors Yu XY, Zhang L, Hu Y , Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Li X 

Received 16 August 2024

Accepted for publication 10 December 2024

Published 18 December 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 5639—5647

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S491846

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Professor Sandip Patil

Xiao-yun Yu,* Lei Zhang,* Yueyue Hu,* Zhongliang Zhu, Yongze Zhu, Xi Li

Centre of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Yongze Zhu; Xi Li, Email forgood2000@163.com; lixi_0611@163.com

Objective: To compare the performance of a new chemiluminescence method with that of the traditional colloidal gold method for cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) detection.
Methods: Cryptococcosis is a global invasive mycosis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing from serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been regarded as the gold standard for early diagnosis. In this study, a total of 140 samples (92 serum and 48 cerebrospinal fluid samples) from 140 patients with suspected cryptococcosis collected between January 2022 and September 2023 at Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital were tested via a fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay analyser (SuperFlex) from Suzhou Xinbo and a cryptococcal antigen detection kit (colloidal gold method) from the IMMY Company of the United States.
Results: According to the diagnostic criteria for cryptococcosis, 55 of the 140 suspected patients were diagnosed with cryptococcosis (39.3%), including 47 with pulmonary cryptococcosis (PC) and 8 with cryptococcal meningitis (CM). The degree of agreement between chemiluminescence and the colloidal gold method was analysed via Cohen’s kappa coefficient, which was 0.970 (P< 0.01). The sensitivities of the chemiluminescence and colloidal gold methods were 98.2% and 96.4%, respectively, and their specificities were 100% and 98.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.996 for chemiluminescence and 0.9759 for the colloidal gold method. The area under the curve (AUC) of the two methods did not differ significantly (P=0.086).
Conclusion: For the detection of CrAg, the new chemiluminescence method is highly consistent with the traditional colloidal gold method and has higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis.

Keywords: cryptococcal antigen, cryptococcosis, chemiluminescence, colloidal gold method