已发表论文

促性腺激素释放激素激动剂联合激素替代疗法显著改善冷冻胚胎移植周期中薄型子宫内膜和壁间肌瘤患者的生殖结局

 

Authors Wei L, Tian B, Wang S, Xu S, Zhang C

Received 25 October 2024

Accepted for publication 5 January 2025

Published 10 January 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 173—183

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S501809

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Qiongyu Guo

Longlong Wei,1,2 Bing Tian,2 Shuna Wang,2 Siyue Xu,2 Cuilian Zhang1,2 

1People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 45003, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Cuilian Zhang, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 7, Wei Wu Road, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, 450003, People’s Republic of China, Email luckyzcl@qq.com

Background: Both intramural myomas and thin endometrium exert a detrimental influence on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). The downregulation of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) is regarded as an effective approach to reducing the size of intramural fibroids and enhancing endometrial receptivity. Consequently, we conducted this study to assess whether the GnRH-a combined with hormone replacement therapy (GnRH-a-HRT) can improve reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles for patients with a thin endometrium (≤ 7 mm) and intramural fibroids.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study encompassed 360 patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles. Patients were stratified into three groups based on the endometrial preparation protocol: the natural cycle (NC) group (n=96), the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) group (n=180), and the GnRH-a-HRT group (n=84). The live birth rate (LBR) was designated as the primary outcome, while clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate were classified as secondary outcomes.
Results: The LBR and CPR in the GnRH-a-HRT group were significantly higher than those in both the HRT group and the NC group (both P < 0.0001). A logistic regression model indicated that the LBR was significantly higher in the GnRH-a-HRT group compared to both the HRT group (odds ratio, 0.269; 95% confidence interval, 0.114– 0.637; P = 0.003) and the NC group (odds ratio, 0.524; 95% confidence interval, 0.457– 0.956; P = 0.023). Subgroup analyses based on the number and dimension of fibroids demonstrate the positive efficacy of the GnRH-a–HRT regimen.
Conclusion: Compared to NC and HRT protocol, improved reproductive outcomes were observed in the GnRH-a–HRT group. These findings provide valuable insights for exploration of the underlying mechanisms by which the GnRH-a-HRT protocol enhances reproductive outcomes in patients of thin endometrium with intramural fibroids.

Keywords: frozen embryo transfer, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, thin endometrium, intramural fibroid