论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
输尿管重复畸形患者输尿管镜碎石术的回顾性研究:临床特征及治疗效果
Authors Luo G , Zhou J, Deng Y
Received 1 May 2025
Accepted for publication 29 July 2025
Published 7 August 2025 Volume 2025:17 Pages 271—278
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S537984
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Panagiotis J Vlachostergios
Gang Luo,1,* Jian Zhou,2,* Yuqing Deng3
1Department of Urology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Wuhan Yaxin General Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Yuqing Deng, Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, People’s Republic of China, Email dengyuqing798@163.com
Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) in patients with ureteral duplication and urinary stones.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 18 patients with ureteral duplication and urolithiasis who underwent URSL between January 2020 and December 2024. A control group of 200 patients with normal urinary anatomy who underwent URSL during the same period was randomly selected. Demographic data, clinical features, stone size and location, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes (operative time, postoperative hospital stay, and complications) were collected and compared between groups.
Results: No significant differences were found in age, gender, or BMI between the two groups. The ureteral duplication group had a higher proportion of patients with a history of urinary stones. Stone location differed significantly, with fewer right-sided ureteral stones in the duplication group. Despite anatomical challenges, there were no significant differences in operative time, hospital stay, or complication rates between the groups.
Conclusion: URSL is a safe and effective treatment for patients with ureteral duplication and urinary stones. Surgical outcomes are comparable to those in patients with normal urinary anatomy. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is needed to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: ureteral duplication, ureteroscopic lithotripsy, surgical outcomes, retrospective study