已发表论文

符合米兰标准的肝细胞癌患者经射频消融后序贯经导管动脉化疗栓塞术与单纯射频消融术的比较

 

Authors Yan H, Zhao C , Liu M, Liu H, Mu L , Xiang Z, Huang M 

Received 14 May 2025

Accepted for publication 18 July 2025

Published 12 August 2025 Volume 2025:12 Pages 1795—1805

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S534039

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Ali Hosni

Huzheng Yan,1,* Chenghao Zhao,1,* Mingming Liu,2,* Huan Liu,1 Luwen Mu,1 Zhanwang Xiang,1,* Mingsheng Huang1,* 

1Department of Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Mingsheng Huang, Email huangmsh@mail.sysu.edu.cn Zhanwang Xiang, Email xiangzhw_2018@sina.com

Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization followed by radiofrequency ablation (cTACE-RFA) versus RFA alone in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria.
Methods: A retrospective analysis included 343 patients with Milan criteria-compliant HCC. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 93 patients underwent cTACE-RFA, and 93 received RFA alone. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS).
Results: The TACE-RFA group demonstrated significantly superior 1-, 3-, and 5-year LPFS rates (84.9%, 58.1%, 36.6%) compared to the RFA group (75.3%, 44.1%, 16.1%; HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.37– 0.79, P=0.001). However, no significant 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS difference (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.61– 1.83, p = 0.843) was observed between cTACE-RFA (95.7%, 80.6%, 59.1%) and RFA alone group (96.8%, 78.5%, 61.3%). Subgroup analyses revealed significant OS improvements with cTACE-RFA in tumor with high-risk locations (HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17– 0.85, p = 0.018) and diameter 3– 5 cm: (HR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12– 0.64, p = 0.003). cTACE-RFA group also was observed significant LPFS improvements for tumors in high-risk locations (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.30– 0.77, p=0.002) or 3– 5 cm in size (HR=0.25, 95% CI: 0.15– 0.41, p< 0.001). Complication rates were comparable, with no procedure-related mortality and similar severe adverse event incidences (P=0.516).
Conclusion: cTACE-RFA significantly prolongs LPFS compared to RFA alone in early HCC, particularly for tumors > 3 cm or in high-risk locations, without increasing major complications.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization