111614
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.4 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.2 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.7 Clin Interv Aging
- 5.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 3.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.6 Int J Women's Health
- 2.9 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.8 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.2 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 3.0 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 3.2 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.0 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.1 J Inflamm Res
- 2.0 Int J Gen Med
- 3.4 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.0 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.2 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.4 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
综合骨科康复方案对尺骨鹰嘴骨折术后肘关节功能恢复效果的分析
Received 6 June 2025
Accepted for publication 17 November 2025
Published 6 December 2025 Volume 2025:17 Pages 573—581
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S545214
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Clark Hung
Xu Hu,1 Zhuojin Wu,2 Shangtuan Zheng1
1Department of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Nanping First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Nanping, Fujian, 353000, People’s Republic of China; 2The 907th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Nanping, Fujian, 353000, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Shangtuan Zheng, Email wmmcb6@163.com
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an integrated orthopedic rehabilitation program on elbow joint function recovery in patients after surgical treatment for ulnar olecranon fractures, compared to conventional rehabilitation.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 87 patients who underwent surgery for ulnar olecranon fractures. Based on the standard of care at the time of admission, patients were assigned to a control group (n=42) receiving conventional rehabilitation or an observation group (n=45) receiving an integrated rehabilitation program. The integrated program comprised preoperative education, standardized in-hospital training, a structured 24-week home-based protocol with phased goals, and monitored follow-up. The primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Secondary outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and complication rates.
Results: The observation group showed a significantly higher rehabilitation effectiveness rate (97.78% vs 80.95%, p=0.026). They also achieved superior MEPS (75.31 vs 53.85, p< 0.001), ADL scores (62.64 vs 55.17, p< 0.001), and lower VAS scores (2.36 vs 4.36, p< 0.001). Elbow ROM improvements in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination were all significantly greater in the observation group (all p< 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly (6.67% vs 9.52%, p=0.924).
Conclusion: The integrated orthopedic rehabilitation program is superior to conventional rehabilitation in promoting functional recovery, improving range of motion, enhancing daily living activities, and alleviating pain in patients after ulnar olecranon fracture surgery. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of a retrospective design and a modest sample size. Integrated rehabilitation represents a highly effective postoperative management strategy for these patients.
Keywords: integrated orthopedic rehabilitation, ulnar olecranon fracture, elbow joint, function recovery, role
1Department of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Nanping First Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Nanping, Fujian, 353000, People’s Republic of China; 2The 907th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force, Nanping, Fujian, 353000, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Shangtuan Zheng, Email wmmcb6@163.com
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an integrated orthopedic rehabilitation program on elbow joint function recovery in patients after surgical treatment for ulnar olecranon fractures, compared to conventional rehabilitation.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 87 patients who underwent surgery for ulnar olecranon fractures. Based on the standard of care at the time of admission, patients were assigned to a control group (n=42) receiving conventional rehabilitation or an observation group (n=45) receiving an integrated rehabilitation program. The integrated program comprised preoperative education, standardized in-hospital training, a structured 24-week home-based protocol with phased goals, and monitored follow-up. The primary outcome was the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Secondary outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and complication rates.
Results: The observation group showed a significantly higher rehabilitation effectiveness rate (97.78% vs 80.95%, p=0.026). They also achieved superior MEPS (75.31 vs 53.85, p< 0.001), ADL scores (62.64 vs 55.17, p< 0.001), and lower VAS scores (2.36 vs 4.36, p< 0.001). Elbow ROM improvements in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination were all significantly greater in the observation group (all p< 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly (6.67% vs 9.52%, p=0.924).
Conclusion: The integrated orthopedic rehabilitation program is superior to conventional rehabilitation in promoting functional recovery, improving range of motion, enhancing daily living activities, and alleviating pain in patients after ulnar olecranon fracture surgery. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limitations of a retrospective design and a modest sample size. Integrated rehabilitation represents a highly effective postoperative management strategy for these patients.
Keywords: integrated orthopedic rehabilitation, ulnar olecranon fracture, elbow joint, function recovery, role