论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Cheng B, Qiu X, Li H, Yang G
Received 16 May 2017
Accepted for publication 28 June 2017
Published 11 August 2017 Volume 2017:13 Pages 983—988
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S141900
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Hoa Le
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Deyun Wang
Purpose: Laser therapy provides an alternative option for treating non-muscle-invasive
bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, the clinical evidence for
potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser en bloc resection is still limited.
Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the 120-W front-firing KTP
laser for the treatment of NMIBC.
Methods: A total of 64 patients with NMIBC treated with
either a 120-W front-firing KTP-photoselective vapo-enucleation of the bladder
tumor (PVEBT, n=34) or transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT,
n=30) were included. En bloc resection was applied to the patients in PVEBT
group.
Results: There was no significant difference in rinsing time (P =0.292), indwelling catheter (P =0.080), pathologic type, and T
stage (P =0.870) between the two groups.
Compared with the TURBT group, patients treated with PVEBT had a shorter
hospitalization stay (P =0.044), a shorter
operation time (P =0.008), and a lower muscle miss
rate (P =0.044). PVEBT is superior to
TURBT in terms of the rate of 1-year recurrence (P =0.015)
and tumor grade progression rate (P =0.019).
Conclusion: The 120-W front-firing KTP laser en bloc
enucleation technique is a safe and feasible procedure for treating patients
with NMIBC. Further external validation in larger cohorts with a long follow-up
period is warranted.
Keywords: bladder cancer,
transurethral resection, en bloc, laser surgery, recurrence