111536
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.4 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.2 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.7 Clin Interv Aging
- 5.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 3.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.6 Int J Women's Health
- 2.9 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.8 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.2 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 3.0 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 3.2 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.0 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.1 J Inflamm Res
- 2.0 Int J Gen Med
- 3.4 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.0 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.2 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.4 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者与配偶照顾者二元评价差异的现状及影响因素研究
Authors Xu J , Chang M, Chen H, Chen L, Luo T, Cheng X
Received 13 August 2025
Accepted for publication 26 November 2025
Published 5 December 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 3901—3912
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S560407
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Ramón Morillo-Verdugo
Jing Xu,1,2 Mengting Chang,1,2 Hongxin Chen,1 Lixia Chen,2 Tiantian Luo,2 Xirong Cheng2
1School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xirong Cheng, Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 23 Nanhu Road, Jianye District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210017, People’s Republic of China, Tel +15365150199, Email efy068@njucm.edu.cn
Background: The dyadic management of COPD and the dyadic health status are profoundly affected by the dyadic appraisals of disease symptoms between patients and their caregivers. However, existing research has not adequately explored the discrepancies in these dyadic appraisals or their underlying determinants.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between February and March 2025 using convenience sampling. A total of 142 pairs of clinically stable patients with COPD and their spousal caregivers were recruited from the Department of Pulmonary Diseases at a tertiary Grade A hospital of traditional Chinese medicine in Jiangsu Province. Data were collected using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Mutuality Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Self-Concealment Scale, and a general information questionnaire. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis, and linear regression was employed to identify the factors influencing the differences in symptom appraisal.
Results: High consistency was observed in the appraisals of physical symptom subscale score, total MSAS score, and global distress index by patients with COPD and their caregivers. However, the patients’ score was higher than their caregivers’ score as it came to the appraisals of psychological symptoms (patients’ score: median, 0.33 [IQR, 0.00– 0.50]; caregivers’ score: median, 0.17 [IQR, 0.00– 0.44]; P< 0.001). Regression analysis indicated that the factors impacting the differences in psychological symptom appraisal were the patients’ gender, the degree of self-concealment, the caregivers’ social support, and their mutuality.
Conclusion: To decrease differences in the appraisal of psychological symptoms between the two parties and to advance the practice and development of the COPD care model, healthcare professionals should focus on the way patients and caregivers share about psychological states and fortify the structure of the caregiver support system.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disease symptom, dyadic appraisals
1School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Xirong Cheng, Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 23 Nanhu Road, Jianye District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210017, People’s Republic of China, Tel +15365150199, Email efy068@njucm.edu.cn
Background: The dyadic management of COPD and the dyadic health status are profoundly affected by the dyadic appraisals of disease symptoms between patients and their caregivers. However, existing research has not adequately explored the discrepancies in these dyadic appraisals or their underlying determinants.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between February and March 2025 using convenience sampling. A total of 142 pairs of clinically stable patients with COPD and their spousal caregivers were recruited from the Department of Pulmonary Diseases at a tertiary Grade A hospital of traditional Chinese medicine in Jiangsu Province. Data were collected using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, Mutuality Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, Self-Concealment Scale, and a general information questionnaire. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis, and linear regression was employed to identify the factors influencing the differences in symptom appraisal.
Results: High consistency was observed in the appraisals of physical symptom subscale score, total MSAS score, and global distress index by patients with COPD and their caregivers. However, the patients’ score was higher than their caregivers’ score as it came to the appraisals of psychological symptoms (patients’ score: median, 0.33 [IQR, 0.00– 0.50]; caregivers’ score: median, 0.17 [IQR, 0.00– 0.44]; P< 0.001). Regression analysis indicated that the factors impacting the differences in psychological symptom appraisal were the patients’ gender, the degree of self-concealment, the caregivers’ social support, and their mutuality.
Conclusion: To decrease differences in the appraisal of psychological symptoms between the two parties and to advance the practice and development of the COPD care model, healthcare professionals should focus on the way patients and caregivers share about psychological states and fortify the structure of the caregiver support system.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disease symptom, dyadic appraisals