已发表论文

一种用于复发性自然流产早期妊娠丢失的新型临床验证机器学习模型:整合血清自身抗体和超声参数

 

Authors Li J, Yang Y, Li T, Sun B, Zhang Y

Received 21 October 2025

Accepted for publication 18 December 2025

Published 8 January 2026 Volume 2026:19 572373

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S572373

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Woon-Man Kung

Jing Li,1 Yang Yang,2 Teng Li,1 Bowei Sun,3 Yongai Zhang1 

1Department of Nursing and Rehabilitation College, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710021, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Reproductive Medicine, Xi’an People’s Hospital (Xi’an Fourth Hospital), Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710004, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of the School of Foreign Languages, Xian Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710021, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yongai Zhang, Email zhangyongai@xiyi.edu.cn

Objective: To explore the correlation between autoantibodies, ultrasonic endometrial receptivity parameters and early miscarriage in recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) patients during subsequent pregnancies, and to establish and validate a predictive model for early miscarriage.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on RSA patients who visited Xi’an People’s Hospital from January 2019 to December 2024. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (70%, n=412) and a validation set (30%, n=177). Baseline data, serum autoantibodies (anti-β 2-glycoprotein 1 antibody [aβ 2-GP1], thyroglobulin antibody [TgAb], anti-sperm antibody [AsAb], anti-cardiolipin antibody [ACA]) and ultrasonic parameters (resistance index [RI], endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, vascularization index [VI], vascularization flow index [VFI]) were collected. Multiple machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], XGBoost, random forest, etc.) were developed. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and other metrics. A nomogram was constructed based on the optimal model.
Results: The abortion subgroup had significantly higher positive rates of aβ 2-GP1, TgAb, ACA and RI, but lower endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, VI and VFI than the normal subgroup (all P< 0.05). Eight variables (aβ 2-GP1, TgAb, AsAb, RI, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, VI, VFI) were identified as candidate predictors. The LR model was optimal, with AUC=0.94 and accuracy=0.93 in the training set, and AUC=0.92 and accuracy=0.90 in the validation set. The nomogram based on this model showed good alignment between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes.
Conclusion: A practical and accurate LR model for predicting early miscarriage in RSA patients was established using autoantibodies and ultrasonic parameters. It can assist in clinical risk stratification and individualized intervention. Future multicenter prospective studies with larger samples and more variables are needed to optimize the model.

Keywords: recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), early miscarriage, autoantibody, ultrasonic parameter, machine learning, prediction model