115563
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.6 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 4.3 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 3.2 Infect Drug Resist
- 4.1 Clin Interv Aging
- 6.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 4.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 8.7 Int J Nanomed
- 2.5 Int J Women's Health
- 3.2 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.4 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.6 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.6 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 3.1 J Pain Res
- 3.5 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 4.5 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 2.4 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.6 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.6 J Inflamm Res
- 2.3 Int J Gen Med
- 3.9 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.3 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.5 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 3.0 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
高度及超高度近视患者植入 EVO ICL 后对比敏感度及视觉质量的长期评估
Authors Ma Y, Fukuyama T, Cao J, Ye Y, Niu L , Yao P, Wang X, Zhou X , Zhao J
Received 19 June 2025
Accepted for publication 1 December 2025
Published 8 January 2026 Volume 2026:20 548177
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S548177
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr John Miller
Yong Ma,1– 4,* Teruko Fukuyama,1– 4,* Jian Cao,1,5 Yuhao Ye,1– 4 Lingling Niu,1– 4 Peijun Yao,1– 4 Xiaoying Wang,1– 4 Xingtao Zhou,1– 4 Jing Zhao1– 4
1Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Jing Zhao, Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86 021 64377134, Email zhaojing_med@163.com Xingtao Zhou, Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86 021 64377134, Email doctzhouxingtao@163.com
Purpose: To determine the contrast sensitivity (CS) and vision quality of patients with high and extreme high myopia following long-term evolution implantable collamer lens (EVO ICL) implantation.
Patients and Methods: Thirty-five patients (60 eyes) with a myopia range of − 7.25 D to − 18.50 D were enrolled. Participants were categorized into the high myopia (HM) (spherical equivalent>-12.0 D) and extreme high myopia (EHM) (spherical equivalent≤-12.0 D) groups. Routine examinations, including measurements of endothelial cell density and anterior chamber parameters, were performed. CS and vision quality were assessed over a long-term follow-up period, with an average final follow-up time of 7.29± 0.82 years.
Results: All surgical procedures were completed without any significant complications. No statistical differences for the CS parameters at the six different spatial frequencies in the corrected and uncorrected conditions were identified between the two groups (P> 0.05). The vision quality questionnaire results indicated both groups reported concerns regarding the frequency of halos (HM group 57.6%, EHM group 63%). Driving was identified as the most distressing postoperative daily life activity. Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between driving distress and CS (B=− 0.40, P< 0.01). The preoperative axial length was found to be correlated with CS (B=− 0.39, P< 0.01).
Conclusion: Patients with HM and EHM maintained good long-term CS and vision quality after EVO ICL implantation. Halos and driving distress were the most common complaints.
Keywords: contrast sensitivity, high myopia, implantation, lens, vision
1Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2NHC Key Laboratory of Myopia Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Shanghai Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Jing Zhao, Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86 021 64377134, Email zhaojing_med@163.com Xingtao Zhou, Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200031, People’s Republic of China, Tel + 86 021 64377134, Email doctzhouxingtao@163.com
Purpose: To determine the contrast sensitivity (CS) and vision quality of patients with high and extreme high myopia following long-term evolution implantable collamer lens (EVO ICL) implantation.
Patients and Methods: Thirty-five patients (60 eyes) with a myopia range of − 7.25 D to − 18.50 D were enrolled. Participants were categorized into the high myopia (HM) (spherical equivalent>-12.0 D) and extreme high myopia (EHM) (spherical equivalent≤-12.0 D) groups. Routine examinations, including measurements of endothelial cell density and anterior chamber parameters, were performed. CS and vision quality were assessed over a long-term follow-up period, with an average final follow-up time of 7.29± 0.82 years.
Results: All surgical procedures were completed without any significant complications. No statistical differences for the CS parameters at the six different spatial frequencies in the corrected and uncorrected conditions were identified between the two groups (P> 0.05). The vision quality questionnaire results indicated both groups reported concerns regarding the frequency of halos (HM group 57.6%, EHM group 63%). Driving was identified as the most distressing postoperative daily life activity. Further analysis revealed a negative correlation between driving distress and CS (B=− 0.40, P< 0.01). The preoperative axial length was found to be correlated with CS (B=− 0.39, P< 0.01).
Conclusion: Patients with HM and EHM maintained good long-term CS and vision quality after EVO ICL implantation. Halos and driving distress were the most common complaints.
Keywords: contrast sensitivity, high myopia, implantation, lens, vision