115563
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.6 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 4.3 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 3.2 Infect Drug Resist
- 4.1 Clin Interv Aging
- 6.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 4.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 8.7 Int J Nanomed
- 2.5 Int J Women's Health
- 3.2 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.4 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.6 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.6 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 3.1 J Pain Res
- 3.5 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 4.5 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 2.4 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.6 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.6 J Inflamm Res
- 2.3 Int J Gen Med
- 3.9 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.3 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.5 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 3.0 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
基于 5A 自我调节护理干预对冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者自我护理能力和幸福感的影响
Authors Wang H, Wang W, Zhang L
Received 22 September 2025
Accepted for publication 18 December 2025
Published 6 January 2026 Volume 2026:19 569413
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S569413
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Veronica Swallow
Huili Wang,1,* Wenjuan Wang,1,* Lihong Zhang2
1Department of Nursing, The Eighth People’s Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, 271126, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth People’s Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, 271126, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Huili Wang, Email eds5213@yeah.net
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on its impact on self-care ability and quality of life.
Methods: This retrospective study included CHD patients who underwent PCI at our hospital between September and December 2023. Based on nursing records, patients who received routine care were assigned to the control group, while those who additionally received a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention formed the intervention group. Eligible patients were identified according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical indicators and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention.
Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups (P> 0.05). After the intervention period, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and longer distances in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) compared with the control group (P< 0.05). Treatment adherence was also higher in the intervention group (P< 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months, patients in the intervention group achieved significantly better scores on the Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management Scale (CSMS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Barthel Index (BI), and Chinese Cardiovascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQQC) (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: The 5A-based self-management nursing intervention appears effective for CHD patients after PCI, improving cardiac function, exercise capacity, self-management behaviors, and overall quality of life. These findings support its potential for broader clinical application.
Keywords: coronary heart disease, PCI, 5A, self-management nursing, effect, self-management, quality of life
1Department of Nursing, The Eighth People’s Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, 271126, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth People’s Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, 271126, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Huili Wang, Email eds5213@yeah.net
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on its impact on self-care ability and quality of life.
Methods: This retrospective study included CHD patients who underwent PCI at our hospital between September and December 2023. Based on nursing records, patients who received routine care were assigned to the control group, while those who additionally received a 5A-based self-management nursing intervention formed the intervention group. Eligible patients were identified according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Clinical indicators and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention.
Results: Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between groups (P> 0.05). After the intervention period, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and longer distances in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) compared with the control group (P< 0.05). Treatment adherence was also higher in the intervention group (P< 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months, patients in the intervention group achieved significantly better scores on the Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management Scale (CSMS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Barthel Index (BI), and Chinese Cardiovascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQQC) (P< 0.05).
Conclusion: The 5A-based self-management nursing intervention appears effective for CHD patients after PCI, improving cardiac function, exercise capacity, self-management behaviors, and overall quality of life. These findings support its potential for broader clinical application.
Keywords: coronary heart disease, PCI, 5A, self-management nursing, effect, self-management, quality of life