论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
广西少数民族地区卫生资源利用效率及其影响因素评估:2010 年至 2022 年数据
Authors Tang Z, Tang A, Sun Z, Cao G, Cao R
Received 23 May 2025
Accepted for publication 9 August 2025
Published 18 August 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 2713—2730
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S534921
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Miss Gulsum Kaya
Zhuanzhi Tang,1 Ajuan Tang,2 Zhe Sun,1 Gai Cao,1 Rong Cao1
1School of Public Administration (School of Emergency Management), Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710127, People’s Republic of China; 2Pediatric Department, Guilin Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guilin, Guangxi, 541001, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Rong Cao, School of Public Administration (School of Emergency Management), Northwest University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, 710127, People’s Republic of China, Email caorong@nwu.edu.cn
Objective: Measuring the efficiency of health resources is one of the tools for determining how resources are utilized. Considering the necessity of assessing health resource efficiency, this study aims to evaluate the efficiency of health resource allocation and its influencing factors in Guangxi, a minority region.
Methods: An input-oriented Data Envelopment Analysis (BCC-DEA) and the Malmquist index model were employed to analyze the static and intertemporal efficiency of health resource allocation in 14 cities in Guangxi from 2010 to 2022. Finally, a Tobit regression model was used to estimate the factors influencing health resource allocation efficiency.
Results: Since the implementation of the new healthcare reform in 2009, the quantity of health resources in Guangxi has increased substantially. The average annual growth rate of total factor productivity change for health resources from 2010 to 2022 was 4.6%. However, the overall efficiency of health resource allocation remained low at 0.675, falling short of DEA effectiveness, with notable disparities across cities. Tobit regression analysis indicated that per capita disposable income (β = 0.252, 95% CI = 0.000– 0.505) and the proportion of healthcare expenditure (β = 0.011, 95% CI = 0.004– 0.017) were positively associated with efficiency scores, while population density (β = − 0.001, 95% CI = − 0.0007 – − 0.0002) was negatively associated. These findings were further validated through a two-stage bootstrap truncated regression.
Conclusion: The efficiency of health resource allocation in Guangxi remains in need of improvement due to issues such as insufficient technological innovation and an unscientific allocation of resource scale. It is recommended that relevant authorities increase investments in health funding and technological innovation, improve institutional mechanisms, and allocate health resources in a scientific and rational manner.
Keywords: health resources, efficiency, productivity, DEA-Tobit model