已发表论文

磁盘扩散法测试是中国临床实践中针对头孢菌素耐药淋病菌株的不适当筛选工具

 

Authors Han Y, Yin YP, Xu WQ, Zhu XY, Chen SC, Dai XQ, Yang LG, Zhu BY, Zhong N, Cao WL, Zhang XH, Wu ZZ, Yuan LF, Zheng ZJ, Liu J, Chen XS

Received 1 February 2020

Accepted for publication 16 June 2020

Published 20 July 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 2417—2423

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S248030

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony

Purpose: Injectable ceftriaxone and oral cefixime are the last agents effective against Neisseria gonorrhoeae . In vitro antimicrobial-susceptibility testing (AST) is done to identify the most efficacious antibiotic needed to combat the infection in that particular individual. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether Kirby–Bauer (KB) disk-diffusion tests can detect N. gonorrhoeae  isolates that have decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime for appropriate clinical management.
Methods: A total of 1,633 consecutive clinical isolates of N. gonorrhoeae  were collected from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017 from seven dermatology clinics located in five provinces in China. Consistency between KB disk-diffusion tests and the agar-dilution method, as well as sensitivity of the KB test for detecting N. gonorrhoeae  isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime, were determined using 1,306 clinical isolates that had been recovered to complete agar-dilution AST.
Results: The prevalence of isolates with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone and cefixime was 12.1% (198 of 1,633) and 12.7% (208 of 1,633), respectively, using KB disk-diffusion tests. The prevalence of isolates with decreased susceptibility was 9.9% (129 of 1,306) for ceftriaxone and 9.9% (129 of 1,305) for cefixime using agar-dilution AST. The categorical agreement of these two methods was 80.9% for both ceftriaxone and cefixime. Compared to agar-dilution AST, the sensitivity of the KB test for detecting N. gonorrhoeae  isolates with decreased susceptibility was 22.5% (29 of 129) for ceftriaxone and 29.5% (38 of 129) for cefixime, and its specificity 87.3% (1,028 of 1,177) for ceftriaxone and 86.7% (1,018 of 1,176) for cefixime.
Conclusion: Although KB tests are easy to carry out in clinical practice, their ability to detect cephalosporin-resistant gonorrhoea strains is limited. This method is not an appropriate selection for screening cephalosporin-resistant gonorrhoea strains in clinical practice in China.
Keywords: Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Kirby–Bauer disk-diffusion tests, agar-dilution method, susceptibility, screen



Table 1 Comparison of Agar-Dilution Method and KB Test for Ceftriaxone