论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
THINC-it 评估两极型忧郁症患者认知功能的可靠性和有效性
Authors Zhang W, Zhu N, Lai J, Liu J, Ng CH, Chen J, Qian C, Du Y, Hu C, Chen J, Hu J, Wang Z, Zhou H, Xu Y, Fang Y, Shi C, Hu S
Received 11 June 2020
Accepted for publication 14 September 2020
Published 21 October 2020 Volume 2020:16 Pages 2419—2428
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S266642
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Yuping Ning
Purpose: The THINC-integrated tool (THINC-it) as a brief screening tool can assesses cognitive impairment in patients with major depressive depression (MDD). Here, we aim to evaluate the reliability and validity of the THINC-it in a bipolar depression (BD-D) group in comparison with a healthy control (HC) group.
Materials and Methods: Both groups were matched according to age, gender, years of education, and IQ. All participants completed the THINC-it test, including Spotter, Symbol Check, Codebreaker, Trails, and the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire for Depression-5-item (PDQ-5-D). The concurrent validity and internal consistency of the THINC-it test were analyzed, and 30 healthy controls were randomly sampled to retest THINC-it to verify the reliability of the THINC-it retest. The correlation between THINC-it and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) was also analyzed.
Results: Fifty-eight patients with BD-D and 61 HCs were included for final analysis. There were significant mean difference (MD) standard errors (SE) between two groups in PDQ-5-D, Spotter and Codebreaker (all P < 0.01), Trails (P =0.015). There was no significant difference in Symbol Check (MD (SE)=− 0.01 (0.18), P =0.938; 95% CI=− 0.38 to 0.35). The Cronbach’s α of PDQ-5-D was 0.640. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was between 0.440 and 0.757. The highest concurrent validity was PDQ-5-D (r=0.812, P < 0.001). PDQ-5-D was positively correlated with HAMD-17 and SDS score (P < 0.01). The objective test had no significant correlation with HAMD-17 and SDS scores (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: This study found that THINC-it can accurately present the cognitive impairment of patients with BD-D. It can be potentially applied in assessing the cognitive function of patients with BD-D although Symbol Check may not accurately reflect the level of cognitive function. The concurrent validity and retest reliability are lower than expected, we need to further increase the sample size to study.
Keywords: bipolar depression, BD-D, major depressive depression, MDD, THINC-it, cognitive function, reliability, validity