已发表论文

tDCS 和 tACS 治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、析因安慰剂对照研究设计

 

Authors Huang Y, Shen L, Huang J, Xu X, Wang Y, Jin H

Received 6 December 2020

Accepted for publication 27 April 2021

Published 12 May 2021 Volume 2021:17 Pages 1459—1468

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S295945

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jun Chen

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are regarded as promising antidepressant treatments.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of tDCS, tACS, escitalopram, and placebo/sham stimulation controls.
Design: Randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Methods: Sample sizes were calculated based on data from previous similar studies. Eligible non-treatment-resistant-depressive outpatient subjects with moderate-to-severe depression (HRDS ≥ 17) are randomized to receive (1) tDCS + placebo; (2) tACS + placebo; (3) escitalopram + placebo; or (4) sham stimulation + placebo. The intensity of electricity is 2 mA, lasting for 30 minutes over two consecutive working days (10 sessions in total). The medication lasts for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the response rates within 6 weeks (week 6 is also the endpoint of the study), and secondary outcome measures included changes in other clinical measurements. Safety and acceptability are measured by adverse event rates and dropout rates. Exploring outcome consist of the performance of cognitive battery as well as neurophysiology results.
Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first double-blind controlled study comparing tDCS, tACS, and clinically used antidepressants, which will provide further evidence for their efficacy and safety in possible clinical applications.
Keywords: transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS, transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS, electrical stimulation, major depressive disorder, MDD