论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
术后恢复对妇科肿瘤术后患者全身炎症反应的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究
Authors Peng J, Dong R, Jiao J, Liu M, Zhang X, Bu H, Dong P, Zhao S, Xing N, Feng S, Yang X, Kong B
Received 30 November 2020
Accepted for publication 29 April 2021
Published 1 June 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 4383—4392
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S294718
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Beicheng Sun
Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has widely gained acceptance in gynecological surgery. Its safety and efficacy should be evaluated fully via well-designed, randomized, control trials. The main objective of our study is to compare the ERAS protocol with the conventional perioperative care program after gynecological oncology. Furthermore, the secondary objectives of our study are the identification of markers that allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of ERAS elements in the modulation of the body’s response to surgical stress.
Methods: Patients with gynecological tumors indicated for surgery were randomly assigned to either the ERAS group or the conventional group. The ERAS protocol included short fasting time, fluid restriction, early oral feeding, reduced opioid consumption and immediate mobilization after surgery. The primary endpoint was the reduction of hospital stay in the ERAS group. The day of first flatus, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), maximum pain score by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and complication, readmission rate, reoperation rate, postoperative mortality, total hospital cost and systemic inflammatory response (SIR) were secondary endpoints.
Results: A total of 130 patients in gynecological tumor surgery were enrolled (ERAS = 65, conventional = 65). The ERAS group had faster bowel function recovery, significantly less pain, less PONV, shorter hospital stay, and less total hospital costs. SIR markers were estimated and screened out that postoperative platelet, neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR) were significantly lower in ERAS groups compared to conventional groups.
Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS protocol is safe and enhances postoperative recovery after gynecological oncology surgery. We firstly reveal the beneficial effect of ERAS protocols on the alleviation of postoperative SIR, which is a reflection of the magnitude of surgical trauma. Postoperative platelet, NLR or PLR could be the novel and inexpensive markers to assess how ERAS protocols modulate gynecological oncology surgery.
Trial Registration: The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03629626).
Keywords: ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery, systemic inflammatory response, gynecological oncology surgery, NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio, PLR, platelet-lymphocyte-ratio