已发表论文

CBBCT 测量的肿瘤腺体体积比与肿瘤乳腺比:保乳手术的可能预测因素

 

Authors Li J, Zhong G, Wang K, Kang W, Wei W

Received 22 March 2021

Accepted for publication 11 May 2021

Published 3 June 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 4463—4471

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S312288

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Sanjeev Srivastava

Background: Breast-conserving surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy is the standard surgical treatment mode for early breast cancer. Currently, there are no clear predictive indicators to determine whether a patient can choose breast-conserving surgery, which mainly depends on the surgeon’s clinical experience and subjective judgment. Cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) reconstructs the breast 3D image from three mutually perpendicular angles, helping surgeons to locate and accurately measure the volume of the tumor, mammary gland, and breast. We used CBBCT to retrospectively measure the tumor-to-gland volume ratio and tumor-to-breast volume ratio in breast cancer cases. Then, we analyzed the correlation between the surgical methods and ratios in breast cancer patients.
Methods: We collected 100 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery as the study group, and 100 patients undergoing mastectomy as the control group. All patients chose the surgical approach after comprehensive consideration of examination results and assessment of patient condition. Patients underwent CBBCT examination before surgery. We retrospectively measured the volume of tumor, mammary glands and breast, then calculated tumor-to-gland and tumor-to-breast volume ratios.
Results: Tumor volume and the ratios of the two groups statistically differed (P < 0.001), while the mammary gland and breast volume did not (P > 0.05). The average tumor-to-gland volume ratio was 4.32% in the study group and 10.74% in the control group, and the average tumor-to-breast volume ratio was 0.74% in the study group and 1.36% in the control group. In breast-conserving surgery, the 95% reference range of tumor-to-gland ratio is (0, 12.90%), and the 95% reference range of tumor-to-breast ratio is (0, 2.17%).
Conclusion: The tumor-to-gland volume ratio and tumor-to-breast volume ratio measured using CBBCT are correlated with the choice of surgical methods (breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy) for breast cancer patients. This can be used as possible predictor of breast-conserving surgery to help surgeons.
Keywords: breast cancer, cone-beam breast computed tomography, CBBCT, tumor-to-gland volume ratio, tumor-to-breast volume ratio, breast-conserving surgery