已发表论文

社区居民基本生活保障意识和抢救意愿现状及影响因素分析

 

Authors Qian YF, Geng GL, Ren YQ, Zhang XT, Sun WJ, Li Q

Received 16 April 2021

Accepted for publication 3 July 2021

Published 24 July 2021 Volume 2021:14 Pages 3129—3136

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S314557

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Mihajlo Jakovljevic

Objective: This study aimed to investigate community residents’ awareness of basic life support (BLS) and their willingness to attempt rescue.
Methods: From October to December 2020, in the communities of Nantong City, a stratified three-stage random sampling method was adopted to select residents from 12 neighborhood committees over the age of 18 with whom to conduct a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. A self-designed questionnaire was adopted, the contents of which included the general situation of the respondent, knowledge, attitude, and behavior in relation to BLS; the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.719.
Results: A total of 3000 questionnaires were distributed, of which 2812 were valid, with a valid response rate of 93.73%. Of the 2812 respondents, 41.18% had seen an automatic external defibrillator (AED), 48.83% had experience of’ cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 25.07% of the respondents had experience of’ AEDs. When an accident occurred, 50.50% of residents were willing to attempt rescue, 70.80% were willing to attempt rescue under professional guidance, and 71.23% were willing to attempt rescue after learning BLS techniques. Of the residents who were unwilling to attempt rescue, 32.75% were worried about their lack of ability, 27.91% were concerned about legal issues, 14.01% feared infectious diseases, and 10.35% were unwilling to perform mouth-to-mouth artificial respiration. Age, occupation, education level, and whether they had participated in first aid training were the influencing factors.
Conclusion: Residents in Nantong have less knowledge of BLS, and their knowledge of CPR is better than that of AEDs. Residents have a strong willingness to learn BLS. Measures need to be taken to improve their understanding of BLS and their application skills. Residents have high levels of willingness to attempt rescue, but a certain percentage of residents have concerns. Interventions can be made to target the different reasons.
Keywords: out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, basic life support, automatic external defibrillator, rescue willing