已发表论文

髓鞘和淋巴细胞蛋白 (MAL): 子宫内膜癌的新生物标志物

 

Authors Li D, Zhang J , Wu L, Yang X, Chen Z, Yuan J

Received 4 May 2021

Accepted for publication 30 August 2021

Published 21 September 2021 Volume 2021:13 Pages 7311—7323

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S317319

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Beicheng Sun

Purpose: Myelin and lymphocyte protein (MAL) plays an essential role in esophageal cancer, classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma and breast cancer. However, its role in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) has not been explored. Therefore, the current study sought to explore the role of MAL in UCEC.
Patients and Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by using Limma package in R based on TCGA-UCEC data. Kaplan–Meier plotter analysis was performed to explore the prognostic value of MAL. Function enrichment analyses were performed using GSVA. Further, roles of MAL in UCEC were validated using clinical cohort, which included 120 tumor and adjacent tissues. qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry analyze the samples. Chi-square tests were performed to explore the associations between MAL expressions and clinicopathological features.
Results: The findings showed that overexpression level of MAL in tumor was correlated with worse survival (p = 0.000424). MAL exhibited predictive power for survival time of UCEC patients (3 years: AUC = 0.635; 5 years: AUC = 0.635). Notably, high expression level of MAL was correlated with advanced stage of UCEC. MAL overexpression was significant in UCEC with microsatellite instability (MSI). Enrichment analysis showed that MAL was enriched mainly in MYC targets, epithelial mesenchymal transition and KRAS signaling. Furthermore, MAL was associated with infiltration of immune cells in the tumor micro-environment and immune checkpoint. Analysis showed a positive association between MAL and T cell (CD4+ memory resting). Correlation analysis showed that MAL was significantly positively correlated with several immune checkpoint, including CD274 (R = 0.3389, p = 0.0081), LAG3 (R = 0.2913, p = 0.0229), PDCD1LG2 (R = 0.5345, p < 0.0001). The prognosis value of MAL was confirmed through the experiment.
Conclusion: The findings of the current study indicated that MAL is an effective prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for UCEC patients. These results indicated that MAL functions as a diagnosis and therapeutic marker in UCEC treatment.
Keywords: MAL, UCEC, prognosis, immune micro environment, biomarker