Background: The optimal timing of invasive coronary revascularization in patients with late presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether late percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with the prognosis of AMI patients with HFpEF presenting > 24h after symptom onset.
Methods: We enrolled 680 AMI patients with HFpEF. Patients were divided into 3 groups: early-PCI strategy (defined as the time to open IRA from symptom onset < 24 h), late-PCI strategy (defined as the time of PCI-mediated reperfusion was > 24 h) and non-revascularization group.
Results: A total of 144 (21.2%) experienced a MACE, including 118 (17.4%) all-cause deaths and 26 (3.8%) re-hospitalization for HF during a follow-up period of 30.20± 15.62 months. After adjusting for gender, age, smoking, diabetes mellitus, NT-proBNP and eGFR, late-PCI was a significant and independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 0.367; 95% confidence interval 0.202– 0.665; p< 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that late-PCI decreased cumulative risk of MACE (p< 0.001).
Conclusion: Late-PCI and early-PCI strategies are associated with a reduced risk of MACE in AMI patients with HFpEF presenting > 24 h after symptom onset, compared to conservative strategies.
Keywords: percutaneous coronary intervention, acute myocardial infarction, prognosis