论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
血清白蛋白与球蛋白的比率与炎症性肠病的存在和严重程度有关
Authors Wang Y, Li C , Wang W , Wang J, Li J, Qian S, Cai C , Liu Y
Received 12 November 2021
Accepted for publication 15 February 2022
Published 14 March 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 1907—1920
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S347161
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Objective: Serum albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) is a marker of inflammatory disease, but its role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unknown. The primary purpose of the present research was to explore the relationship between serum AGR and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Methods: A total of 179 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), 210 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD), and non-IBD controls (age- and gender-matched controls who have gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms) were enrolled in the research. Demographic data, endoscopic score, and serum biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), white blood cell (WBC) count, and Ca2+ were included. The Mayo score and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) were applied to evaluate the disease activity of UC and CD, respectively.
Results: Serum AGR was significantly lower among IBD patients compared with non-IBD controls. There was a negative association between serum AGR and Mayo score in patients with UC (r = − 0.413, p < 0.001), and serum AGR was also associated with HBI score in patients with CD (r = − 0.471, p < 0.001). After adjusting other potential variables, low serum AGR (below-median) was independently associated with Mayo score (β = − 0.196, p = 0.026) and HBI score (β = − 0.162, p = 0.022), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for AGR to distinguish UC was 0.701, and the AUC of CD was 0.759. Based on the optimal cut-off value, multivariate logistic regression indicates that low AGR can differentiate UC from non-UC (OR = 2.564, 95% CI = 1.433– 4.587, p = 0.002) and CD from non-CD (OR = 3.732, 95% CI = 1.640– 8.492, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: AGR may become a promising candidate to help clinicians differentiate IBD and evaluate IBD disease activity. Inflammation and nutritional status might be the future directions to explore its mechanism.
Keywords: inflammatory bowel disease, biomarker, inflammation, malnutrition, activity evaluation