论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
非小细胞肺癌中 m6A 调节因子介导的甲基化修饰模式和肿瘤微环境浸润特征
Authors Fan Y , Zhou Y, Lou M, Li X, Zhu X, Yuan K
Received 3 January 2022
Accepted for publication 9 March 2022
Published 23 March 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 1969—1989
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S356841
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Ning Quan
Purpose: The role of RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in the progression of multiple tumours and the tumour microenvironment (TME) has been progressively demonstrated and promises a new direction for tumour therapy. However, there have been no reports on systematic analyses of RNA m6A modification in TME in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients and Methods: In this study, we used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify three m6A modification patterns of 28 m6A regulators and three m6A gene signature subgroups of commonly differentially expressed genes (co-DEGs) in the three m6A modification patterns. Quantifying these subtypes using the ssGSEA and ESTIMATE algorithms to characterise the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) in NSCLC. Based on the principal component analysis (PCA), we used co-DEGs to construct m6A scores to analyse the characteristics of m6A modifications in individual patients and assessed the practical clinical utility of m6A scores using a nomogram for survival prediction.
Results: A total of 28 m6A regulators in 1210 NSCLC samples were mainly enriched in RNA modification and metabolic biological processes. The three following m6A modification patterns were identified based on the role of the 28 m6A regulators in TME: immune inflammation, immune evasion and immune desert. The m6A scores calculated based on co-DEGs in these modification patterns were significantly positively correlated with immune infiltration and significantly negatively correlated with tumour mutational burden (TMB). Survival was significantly better in the high-m6A-score group than in the low-m6A-score group, and the m6A score could be used as an independent favourable prognostic factor. In addition, assessment of both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and immunophenoscore (IPS) revealed a better immunotherapeutic effect in the high-m6A-score group.
Conclusion: The modification characteristics of 28 m6A regulators in the TIME of NSCLC were analysed from a comprehensive to an individual basis, which may facilitate the development of more effective clinical immunotherapeutic strategies.
Keywords: immunophenotype, immunotherapy, m6A modification, non-small cell lung cancer, tumour microenvironment