论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
健康筛查中使用常规临床数据预测肾功能下降风险的统计模型和机器学习方法的比较
Authors Cao X, Lin Y, Yang B, Li Y, Zhou J
Received 5 November 2021
Accepted for publication 16 April 2022
Published 26 April 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 817—826
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S346856
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Mecit Can Emre Simsekler
Purpose: Using machine learning method to predict and judge unknown data offers opportunity to improve accuracy by exploring complex interactions between risk factors. Therefore, we evaluate the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms and to compare them with logistic regression for predicting the risk of renal function decline (RFD) using routine clinical data.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study includes datasets from 2166 subjects, aged 35– 74 years old, provided by an adult health screening follow-up program between 2010 and 2020. Seven different ML models were considered – random forest, gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, adaptive boosting, and decision tree - and were compared with standard logistic regression. There were 24 independent variables, and the baseline estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was used as the predictive variable.
Results: A total of 2166 participants (mean age 49.2± 11.2 years old, 63.3% males) were enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n=1732) and a test set (n=434). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for detecting RFD corresponding to the different models were above 0.85 during the training phase. The gradient boosting algorithms exhibited the best average prediction accuracy (AUROC: 0.914) among all algorithms validated in this study. Based on AUROC, the ML algorithms improved the RFD prediction performance, compared to logistic regression model (AUROC:0.882), except the K-nearest neighbors and decision tree algorithms (AUROC:0.854 and 0.824, respectively). However, the improvement differences with logistic regression were small (less than 4%) and nonsignificant.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that the proposed health screening dataset-based RFD prediction model using ML algorithms is readily applicable, produces validated results. But logistic regression yields as good performance as ML models to predict the risk of RFD with simple clinical predictors.
Keywords: deep learning, chronic kidney disease, algorithm, health examination