论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
系统性利多卡因对幕上肿瘤切除患者术后早期恢复质量的影响
Authors Zhao K, Dong Y , Su G, Wang Y, Ji T, Wu N , Cui X, Li W , Yang Y, Chen X
Received 5 February 2022
Accepted for publication 6 April 2022
Published 22 April 2022 Volume 2022:16 Pages 1171—1181
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S359755
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Tin Wui Wong
Purpose: Lidocaine has been gradually used in general anesthesia. This study was designed to investigate the effect of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection, and to explore its brain-injury alleviation effect in neurosurgical anesthesia.
Patients and Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective supratentorial tumor resection. Patients were randomly assigned either to receive lidocaine (Group L: 1.5 mg/kg bolus completed 10 min before anesthesia induction followed by an infusion at 2.0 mg/kg/h) or to receive normal saline (Group C: received volume-matched normal saline at the same infusion rate). Primary outcome measures were Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. Plasma concentrations of S100B protein (S100B), neuron specific enolase (NSE), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) before anesthesia induction and at the end of surgery were assessed. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were assessed at 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Perioperative parameters and adverse events were also recorded.
Results: Patients between two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 and POD 2 were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in group L (165.5± 3.8 vs 173.7± 4.7) than those in group C (155.6± 4.0 vs 163.2± 4.5); and scores of physical comfort, emotional state, and pain in group L were superior to those in group C (P < 0.05). In group L, patients possessed lower plasma concentration of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, TNF-α) and brain injury-related factors (S100B, NSE) (P < 0.05), consumed less remifentanil and propofol, and experienced lower pain intensity. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated age and pain were correlated with postperative recovery quality.
Conclusion: Systemic lidocaine improved early recovery quality after supratentorial tumor resection with general anesthesia, and had certain brain-injury alleviation effects. These benefits may be attributed to the inflammation-alleviating and analgesic properties of lidocaine.
Keywords: lidocaine, brain neoplasm, supratentorial tumor resection, recovery quality, brain protection, postoperative pain