论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
动态骨折活动度在确定急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折最佳手术选择中的价值
Authors Ren H, Feng T, Hu Y, Yao G, Yu D, Cao J
Received 31 March 2022
Accepted for publication 27 July 2022
Published 13 August 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 2327—2336
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S368493
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Krishnan Chakravarthy
Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to verify whether the use of a balloon in balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) could offer a higher degree of vertebral height restoration and deformity correction than percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) after adjustment for preoperative dynamic fracture mobility. We expect that this research will help surgeons to determine the optimum operation choice (PVP or BKP) for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
Patients and Methods: We evaluated retrospectively 262 patients who were treated by PVP or BKP for acute, single-level OVCF at our institution from July 2015 to July 2019. According to the presence or absence of dynamic fracture mobility, the patients were divided into two groups: mobile group and fixed group. We compared the changes in the vertebral height and kyphotic angle for PVP and BKP, respectively, within each group.
Results: In the mobile group, the anterior vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 8.73± 5.27%; PVP group, 2.96± 1.59%), middle vertebral height restoration (BKP group, 7.58± 5.18%; PVP group, 2.74± 1.24%) and kyphotic angle correction (BKP group, 4.41± 4.46°; PVP group, 1.38± 1.60°) due to percutaneous vertebral augmentation technique itself were more obvious in BKP group compared with PVP group (P < 0.05). The BKP group has lower incidence of bone cement leakage (BKP group, 10.17%; PVP group, 25.53%, P < 0.05). In the fixed group, differences from comparison of changes were not statistically significant between PVP and BKP (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The use of a balloon in BKP could offer greater kyphosis correction, higher vertebral body height restoration, and lower cement leakage rate than PVP if a fractured vertebral body existed dynamic mobility. However, all these advantages of BKP over PVP are not obvious and could be overrated for a fixed fracture exhibited no mobility. BKP is recommended for a fractured vertebral body with dynamic mobility. PVP is suggested for a fixed fractured vertebral body with no mobility as it produces similar capability of vertebral height restoration, kyphosis correction, and cement leakage as BKP.
Keywords: dynamic fracture mobility, optimum operation choice, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty