论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
基于血液生物标志物的急性静脉血栓栓塞患者死亡风险预测模型
Received 29 June 2022
Accepted for publication 10 August 2022
Published 18 August 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 4725—4735
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S379360
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Adam Bachstetter
Background: Most studies to date have focused on predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but prediction models about mortality risk in VTE are rarely reported. We sought to develop and validate a multivariable model to predict the all-cause mortality risk in patients with acute VTE in emergency settings.
Methods: A total of 700 patients were included from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and were randomly assigned into training set (n=490) and validation set (n=210) in an 7:3 ratio. Multivariate logistics regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables and develop a prediction model, which was validated internally using bootstrap method. The discrimination, calibration and clinical utility were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test, Kaplan-meier (KM) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: There were 52 patients (10.6%) dying and 437 (89.4%) surviving in training set. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 4.158, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.426– 7.127), pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.779, 95% CI: 1.124– 2.814), platelet count (OR: 0.507, 95% CI: 0.310– 0.830), D-dimer (OR: 1.826, 95% CI: 1.133– 2.942) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (OR: 2.166, 95% CI: 1.259– 3.727) were independent risk variables associated with all-cause mortality. The model had good predictive capability with an AUC of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.668,0.825), a sensitivity of 0.769 (95% CI: 0.607,0.889), a specificity of 0.672 (95% CI: 0.634,0.707). The validation model had an AUC of 0.739 (95% CI: 0.685,0.793), a sensitivity of 0.690 (95% CI: 0.580,0.787), a specificity of 0.693 (95% CI: 0.655,0.729). The model is well calibrated and the HL test showed a good fit (χ2=5.291, p=0.726, Nagelkerke R2=0.137). KM analysis and DCA showed a good clinical utility of the nomogram.
Conclusion: This study identified independent variables affecting all-cause mortality in patients with acute VTE, and developed a prediction model and provided a nomogram with good prediction capability and clinical utility.
Keywords: venous thromboembolism, prediction model, mortality, risk variable, platelet/lymphocyte ratio