已发表论文

STE+LDDSE 与 CMR-FT 对 STEMI 患者 PCI 后冠状动脉微血管阻塞的诊断价值比较

 

Authors Liu T, Wang C, Yin J, Wang L , Xuan H, Yan Y, Chen J, Bao J, Li D, Xu T

Received 16 May 2022

Accepted for publication 9 August 2022

Published 15 August 2022 Volume 2022:18 Pages 813—823

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S374866

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr De-Yun Wang

Background: Coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO) is closely associated with poor prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, data showing the comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) combined with low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) in evaluating CMVO was scarcely available. We aimed to explore and compare the predictive value between CMR-FT and STE+LDDSE in detecting CMVO.
Methods: Sixty-one STEMI patients were executed cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography within the first 5– 7 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The myocardial strain analysis was performed in STE, STE+LDDSE, and CMR-FT, and strain parameters included radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS), and longitudinal strain (LS). ROC curves were performed to predict infarcted myocardium segments with CMVO.
Results: Finally, 324 infarcted myocardium segments were analyzed, including 100 infarcted segments with CMVO and 224 segments without CMVO by the gold standard assessment of late gadolinium-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR). The results showed that CS was generally superior to RS and LS in identifying CMVO. CS in CMR-FT facilitated the detection of CMVO, with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 78.00%, 81.25%, and 80.25%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CS in STE combined with LDDSE were better than STE alone (76.00% vs 60.00%, 79.91% vs 64.29%, and 78.70% vs 62.96%, < 0.05). In addition, CMR-FT is not superior to STE+LDDSE for detection of CMVO (> 0.05).
Conclusion: Low-dose dobutamine can improve the clinical value of STE for evaluating CMVO in STEMI patients. Compared with CMR-FT, STE+LDDSE might be a better choice for STEMI patients because of its safety, convenience, and low-cost.
Keywords: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, magnetic resonance feature tracking, speckle tracking echocardiography, low-dose dobutamine, coronary microvascular obstruction