论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
中国急性缺血性卒中患者住院急救治疗延迟:与入院时间的关系及对分诊途径的影响
Authors Yang H , Wu Z, Huang X , Zhang M, Fu Y, Wu Y, Liu L, Li Y, Wang HH
Received 3 May 2022
Accepted for publication 18 November 2022
Published 5 January 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 57—68
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S371687
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Introduction: Timely access to emergency treatment during in-hospital care phase is critical for managing the onset of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), particularly in developing countries. We aimed to explore in-hospital emergency treatment delay and the relation of door-to-needle (DTN) time to ambulance arrivals vs walk-in arrivals.
Methods: Data were collected from 1276 Chinese AIS patients admitted to a general, tertiary-level hospital for intravenous thrombolysis. Information on patients’ characteristics and time taken during in-hospital emergency treatment was retrieved from the hospital registry data and medical records. Ambulance arrival was defined as being transported by emergency ambulance services, while walk-in arrival was defined as arriving at hospital by regular vehicle. In-hospital emergency treatment delay occurred when the DTN time exceeded 60 minutes. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to explore the association between hospital arrivals (by ambulance vs by walk-in) and treatment delay after adjustment for age, sex, education, marital status, residence, medical insurance, number of symptoms, clinical severity and survival outcome.
Results: Over half (53.76%) of patients aged over 60 years. Around one-fifth (20.61%) of patients admitted to hospital through emergency ambulance services, while their counterparts arrived by regular vehicle. Overall, the median time taken from the hospital door to treatment initiation was 86.0 minutes. Patients arrived by ambulance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.744, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.185– 2.566, p = 0.005), had higher socio-economic status (aOR = 1.821, 95% CI = 1.251– 2.650; p = 0.002), or paid out-of-pocket (aOR = 2.323, 95% CI = 1.764– 3.060; p < 0.001) had an increased likelihood of in-hospital emergency treatment delays.
Conclusion: In-hospital emergency treatment delay is common in China, and occurs throughout the entire emergency treatment journey. Having a triage pathway involving hospital arrival by ambulance seems to be more likely to experience in-hospital emergency treatment delay. Further efforts to improve triage pathways may require qualitative evidence on provider- and institutional-level factors associated with in-hospital emergency treatment delay.
Keywords: in-hospital emergency treatment, acute ischaemic stroke, treatment delay, hospital arrival, triage pathways