108384
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.4 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.2 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.6 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.7 Clin Interv Aging
- 5.1 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 3.1 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.6 Int J Women's Health
- 2.9 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.8 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.2 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 3.0 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 3.2 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.4 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.0 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.1 J Inflamm Res
- 2.0 Int J Gen Med
- 3.4 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.0 J Asthma Allergy
- 2.2 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.4 J Multidiscip Healthc
中国南疆结核分枝杆菌分离株的遗传特征赋予异烟肼和乙硫异烟胺的共同抗性
Authors Cao B, Mijiti X, Deng LL, Wang Q, Yu JJ, Anwaierjiang A, Qian C, Li M, Fang DA , Jiang Y, Zhao LL, Zhao X, Wan K, Liu H , Li G, Yuan X
Received 23 February 2023
Accepted for publication 2 May 2023
Published 19 May 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 3117—3135
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S407525
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor M Mora-Montes
Background: Ethionamide (ETH), a structural analogue of isoniazid (INH), is used for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Due to the common target InhA, INH and ETH showed cross-resistance in M. tuberculosis . This study aimed to explore the INH and ETH resistant profiles and genetic mutations conferring independent INH- or ETH-resistance and INH-ETH cross-resistance in M. tuberculosis circulating in south of Xinjiang, China.
Methods: From Sep 2017 to Dec 2018, 312 isolates were included using drug susceptibility testing (DST), spoligotyping, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) to analyze the resistance characteristics for INH and/or ETH.
Results: Among the 312 isolates, 185 (58.3%) and 127 (40.7%) belonged to the Beijing family and non-Beijing family, respectively; 90 (28.9%) were INH-resistant (INHR) with mutation rates of 74.4% in katG , 13.3% in inhA and its promoter, 11.1% in ahpC and its upstream region, 2.2% in ndh , 0.0% in mshA , whilst 34 (10.9%) were ETH-resistant (ETHR) with mutation rates of 38.2% in ethA , 26.2% in inhA and its promoter, and 5.9% in ndh , 0.0% in ethR or mshA ; and 25 (8.0%) were INH-ETH co-resistant (INHRETHR) with mutation rates of 40.0% in inhA and its promoter, and 8% in ndh. katG mutants tended to display high-level resistant to INH; and more inhA and its promoter mutants showed low-level of INH and ETH resistance. The optimal gene combinations by WGS for the prediction of INHR, ETHR, and INHRETHR were, respectively, katG+inhA and its promoter (sensitivity: 81.11%, specificity: 90.54%), ethA+inhA and its promoter+ndh (sensitivity: 61.76%, specificity: 76.62%), and inhA and its promoter+ndh (sensitivity: 48.00%, specificity: 97.65%).
Conclusion: This study revealed the high diversity of genetic mutations conferring INH and/or ETH resistance among M. tuberculosis isolates, which would facilitate the study on INHR and/or ETHR mechanisms and provide clues for choosing ETH for MDR treatment and molecular DST methods in south of Xinjiang, China.
Keywords: cross-resistance, ethionamide, isoniazid, mutation, Mycobacterium tuberculosis