论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
结合 ABVS 冠状面和应变弹性成像的乳腺病变放射组学分析
Authors Ma Q , Shen C, Gao Y, Duan Y, Li W, Lu G, Qin X, Zhang C, Wang J
Received 15 March 2023
Accepted for publication 23 May 2023
Published 26 May 2023 Volume 2023:15 Pages 381—390
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S410356
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Pranela Rameshwar
Background: Breast cancer is the most common tumor globally. Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) and strain elastography (SE) can provide more useful breast information. The use of radiomics combined with ABVS and SE images to predict breast cancer has become a new focus. Therefore, this study developed and validated a radiomics analysis of breast lesions in combination with coronal plane of ABVS and SE to improve the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases.
Patients and Methods: 620 pathologically confirmed breast lesions from January 2017 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into a training set (n=434) and a validation set (n=186). Radiomic features of the lesions were extracted from ABVS, B-ultrasound, and strain elastography (SE) images, respectively. These were then filtered by Gradient Boosted Decision Tree (GBDT) and multiple logistic regression. The ABVS model is based on coronal plane features for the breast, B+SE model is based on features of B-ultrasound and SE, and the multimodal model is based on features of three examinations. The evaluation of the predicted performance of the three models used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: The area under the curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the multimodal model in the training set are 0.975 (95% CI:0.959– 0.991),93.78%, 92.02%, and 96.49%, respectively, and 0.946 (95% CI:0.913 − 0.978), 87.63%, 83.93%, and 93.24% in the validation set, respectively. The multimodal model outperformed the ABVS model and B+SE model in both the training (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively) and validation sets (P < 0.001, P = 0.034, respectively).
Conclusion: Radiomics from the coronal plane of the breast lesion provide valuable information for identification. A multimodal model combination with radiomics from ABVS, B-ultrasound, and SE could improve the diagnostic efficacy of breast masses.
Keywords: radiomics, automated breast volume scanner, strain elastography, ultrasound, breast cancer