论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
快速血糖监测系统产生的血糖指数与糖尿病血管并发症之间的相关性
Authors Sheng X, Li T, Hu Y, Xiong CS, Hu L
Received 21 April 2023
Accepted for publication 21 July 2023
Published 16 August 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 2447—2456
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S418224
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Konstantinos Tziomalos
Objective: To discuss the relationship between time in range (TIR) which is deprived of the FGMS and the risk of diabetic vascular complications and to provide a theoretical foundation for the clinical application of TIR and other FGMS-deprived indexes.
Methods: Patients with T2DM who wore the FGMS sensor continuously were enrolled. Relevant indexes such as TIR, time below range (TBR), time above range (TAR), a standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), coefficient of variation of blood glucose (CV), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) generated by the FGMS were recorded, and the risk of diabetic vascular complications were followed up for one year. The TIR was measured by continuous glucose monitoring at baseline, and patients were grouped according to TIR every 20%. Finally, the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the association of different levels of TIR with different rates of diabetic vascular complications.
Results: TIR was negatively correlated with HbA1C, CV, SDBG, and amplitude of glycemic excursion (MV), wherein, the lower the TIR, the higher the HbA1C, CV, SDBG, and MV. TIR in the diabetic microvascular complication was significantly lower than that in the non-microvascular complication group, and the difference was statistically significant. TIR < 40% was identified as a risk factor for DN, DPN, and DR according to the risk assessment. The mean TAR in the DN group was significantly higher than that in the non-DN group. TAR, CV, SD, MAGE, and HbA1C in the DR group were significantly higher than those in the non-DR group. TAR, ABG, CV, SD, MAGE, and HbA1C in the DPN group were significantly higher than those in the non-DPN group.
Conclusion: The relationships between the TIR and the prevalence and risk of diabetic vascular complications and the HbA1C may be negative. Other CGM-deprived indexes such as CV and MV should be integrated into glycemic control and diabetes complication prediction.
Keywords: flash glucose monitoring system, diabetes, diabetic vascular complications, time in range, HbA1C