论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
左束支起搏与右心室起搏对左心室功能影响的超声心动图评估
Authors Mao Y, Xie Y, Tang J, Shen Y, Liu Y, Sun B
Received 18 May 2023
Accepted for publication 19 August 2023
Published 4 September 2023 Volume 2023:16 Pages 4007—4016
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S418315
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the left ventricular function effects of permanent left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) versus traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP).
Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients receiving pacemaker implantation were included and divided into left bundle branch block (LBBB) group and right ventricular pacing (RVP) group. Baseline characteristics were collected, and they received 1-year follow-up. Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics and pacing parameters were assessed before and after implantation. Cardiac function parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were recorded and compared.
Results: Of 78 patients included, 45 patients received LBBP (mean age, 72.7 ± 12.2 years; male, 55.6%) and 33 patients underwent RVP (mean age 72.9 ± 11.8 years; male, 63.6%). The pacing parameters were satisfactory during the implantation and remained stable during mid-term follow-up. During the follow-up period, LBBP patients had a greater decrease in LVEDD and LVESD. The TR in the LBBP group was significantly improved as compared to the RVP group (P =0.016).
Conclusion: Permanent LBBP achieves favorable cardiac hemodynamic effects with good stability and safety. LBBP may reduce severe TR at 1-year follow-up, and LBBP may be an option for patients with severe TR.
Keywords: left bundle branch pacing, electrical synchrony, mechanical synchrony, left ventricular function, tricuspid regurgitation