已发表论文

急性原发角闭合和急性原发角闭合青光眼后的旁中心急性中黄斑病变

 

Authors Xiao H, Guo N, Li J, Jin L, Liu Y, Lin S, Fang L, Liu X, Zuo C

Received 26 August 2023

Accepted for publication 2 November 2023

Published 20 November 2023 Volume 2023:17 Pages 3513—3523

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S437075

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Purpose: To report the prevalence, clinical characteristics and risk factors for paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) following acute primary angle closure (APAC) and acute primary angle closure glaucoma (APACG).
Methods: This retrospective study consecutively recruited patients diagnosed with APAC or APACG. Based on the spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics, PAMM eyes were divided into three stages. Characteristics of different stages such as the time from symptoms to treatment (TST), retinal thickness and BCVA improvement were analyzed. The risk factors of PAMM were evaluated by binary logistic regression models.
Results: A total of 781 eyes of 781 APAC or APACG patients were included, and PAMM was found in 22 (2.9%) of them. Stage III eyes had a significantly longer TST than stage I eyes (P = 0.008) while exhibiting significantly thinner retinal thicknesses (P < 0.0001). The BCVA improvement was significantly worse in the eyes treated in stage III than in those treated in stage I (P = 0.008). Older age, longer axial length and without type 2 diabetes were associated with a lower risk of incident PAMM (OR = 0.95, P = 0.028; OR = 0.52, P = 0.019; OR = 3.92, P = 0.022).
Conclusion: PAMM can be secondary to APAC or APACG at a rate of 2.9%. Different visual outcomes were observed in patients who received the intervention at different stages of PAMM. Younger patients with a shorter axial length and type 2 diabetes were found to be more susceptible to PAMM.
Keywords: paracentral acute middle maculopathy, acute primary angle closure, acute primary angle closure glaucoma, risk factors, spectral domain optical coherence tomography