论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
评估 ChatGPT 对患者有关红斑痤疮常见问题的答复的可靠性和临床适用性
Authors Yan S , Du D , Liu X , Dai Y, Kim MK , Zhou X, Wang L, Zhang L, Jiang X
Received 16 October 2023
Accepted for publication 22 January 2024
Published 31 January 2024 Volume 2024:18 Pages 249—253
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S444928
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Reem Kayyali
Objective: Artificial intelligence chatbot, particularly ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer), is capable of analyzing human input and generating human-like responses, which shows its potential application in healthcare. People with rosacea often have questions about alleviating symptoms and daily skin-care, which is suitable for ChatGPT to response. This study aims to assess the reliability and clinical applicability of ChatGPT 3.5 in responding to patients’ common queries about rosacea and to evaluate the extent of ChatGPT’s coverage in dermatology resources.
Methods: Based on a qualitative analysis of the literature on the queries from rosacea patients, we have extracted 20 questions of patients’ greatest concerns, covering four main categories: treatment, triggers and diet, skincare, and special manifestations of rosacea. Each question was inputted into ChatGPT separately for three rounds of question-and-answer conversations. The generated answers will be evaluated by three experienced dermatologists with postgraduate degrees and over five years of clinical experience in dermatology, to assess their reliability and applicability for clinical practice.
Results: The analysis results indicate that the reviewers unanimously agreed that ChatGPT achieved a high reliability of 92.22% to 97.78% in responding to patients’ common queries about rosacea. Additionally, almost all answers were applicable for supporting rosacea patient education, with a clinical applicability ranging from 98.61% to 100.00%. The consistency of the expert ratings was excellent (all significance levels were less than 0.05), with a consistency coefficient of 0.404 for content reliability and 0.456 for clinical practicality, indicating significant consistency in the results and a high level of agreement among the expert ratings.
Conclusion: ChatGPT 3.5 exhibits excellent reliability and clinical applicability in responding to patients’ common queries about rosacea. This artificial intelligence tool is applicable for supporting rosacea patient education.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, rosacea, patient education