已发表论文

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死机械再灌注后视觉功能失配的决定因素和预后

 

Authors Liu J, Jin J , Yu B, Zhang S, Lu X, Chen G, Yang Y, Dong H 

Received 24 October 2023

Accepted for publication 9 February 2024

Published 27 February 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 693—704

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S444933

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Yuriy Sirenko

Background: Discordance between the anatomy and physiology of the coronary has important implications for managing patients with stable coronary disease, but its significance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been fully elucidated.
Methods: The retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), along with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessments. Patients were stratified into four groups regarding the severity of the culprit vessel, both visually and functionally: concordantly negative (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] ≤ 50% and QFR > 0.80), mismatch (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR > 0.80), reverse mismatch (QCA-DS ≤ 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80), and concordantly positive (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical factors linked to visual-functional mismatches. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was conducted to estimate the 18-month adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival between the four groups.
Results: The study involved 310 patients, with 68 presenting visual-functional mismatch, and 51 exhibiting reverse mismatch. The mismatch was associated with higher angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance (AMR) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.016, 95% CI: 1.010– 1.022, P< 0.001). Reverse mismatch was associated with larger area stenosis (aOR=1.044, 95% CI: 1.004– 1.086, P=0.032), lower coronary flow velocity (aOR=0.690, 95% CI: 0.567– 0.970, P< 0.001) and lower AMR (aOR=0.947, 95% CI: 0.924– 0.970, P< 0.001). Additionally, the mismatch group showed the worst 18-month MACE-free survival among the four groups (Log rank test p = 0.013).
Conclusion: AMR plays a significant role in the occurrence of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and QFR, and the mismatch group showed the worst prognosis.

Keywords: ST-elevation myocardial infarction, quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative flow ratio, angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance