论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
使用集成生物标志物对 2 型糖尿病肾病进行基于机器学习的预测模型:单中心回顾性研究
Authors Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Yang M, Tang N, Liu L, Wu J, Yang Y
Received 2 February 2024
Accepted for publication 16 April 2024
Published 10 May 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 1987—1997
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S458263
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Juei-Tang Cheng
Ying Zhu,* Yiyi Zhang,* Miao Yang, Nie Tang, Limei Liu, Jichuan Wu, Yan Yang
Department of Endocrinology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Yan Yang, Department of Endocrinology, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, People’s Republic of China, Email yangyan_2012@126.com
Purpose: Diabetic nephropathy (DN), a major complication of diabetes mellitus, significantly impacts global health. Identifying individuals at risk of developing DN is crucial for early intervention and improving patient outcomes. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based predictive model using integrated biomarkers.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on a baseline dataset involving 2184 participants without DN, categorized based on their development of DN over a follow-up period of 36 months: DN (n=1270) and Non-DN (n=914). Various demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. The findings were validated using an independent dataset comprising 468 participants, with 273 developing DN and 195 remaining as Non-DN over the follow-up period. Machine learning algorithms, alongside traditional descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.
Results: Elevated levels of serum creatinine, urea, and reduced eGFR, alongside an increased prevalence of retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy, were prominently observed in those who developed DN. Validation on the independent dataset further confirmed the model’s robustness and consistency. The SVM model demonstrated superior performance in the training set (AUC=0.79, F1-score=0.74) and testing set (AUC=0.83, F1-score=0.82), outperforming other models. Significant predictors of DN included serum creatinine, eGFR, presence of diabetic retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion: Integrating machine learning algorithms with clinical and biomarker data at baseline offers a promising avenue for identifying individuals at risk of developing diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes patients over a 36-month period.
Keywords: diabetic nephropathy, prediction, machine learning, biomarkers, risk stratification, type 2 diabetes