已发表论文

经皮椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术治疗老年患者相邻节段疾病与腰椎间盘突出症

 

Authors Yuan S , Lu X, Zang L , Mei Y, Fan N, Du P

Received 29 December 2023

Accepted for publication 21 June 2024

Published 26 June 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2257—2265

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S457225

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Kushang V Patel

Shuo Yuan,* Xuanyu Lu,* Lei Zang, Yuqi Mei, Ning Fan, Peng Du

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Lei Zang, Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 5 JingYuan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, People’s Republic of China, Email zanglei@ccmu.edu.cn

Purpose: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) was used as a minimally invasive treatment option for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, studies focusing on the clinical outcomes of PTED for elderly patients with adjacent segment disease (ASD) were limited. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of PTED between ASD and LDH in elderly patients.
Patients and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 39 patients with ASD and 39 patients with LDH. Both groups had undergone PTED in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from July 4, 2016 to July 30, 2021. Visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to value the clinical outcomes of patients preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patients’ satisfaction was evaluated based on the MacNab criteria.
Results: All operations were completed. The excellent or good clinical outcomes at final follow-up was demonstrated by 87.15% (34/39) and 89.74% (35/39) in ASD and non-ASD patients, respectively. Clinical improvement was observed immediately postoperatively in both groups and sustained stability during the postoperative follow-up. The ASD group demonstrated significantly longer hospital stays (p = 0.02) and operative time (p < 0.01) than the non-ASD group.
Conclusion: PTED is an effective and minimally invasive treatment option for revision surgery of ASD, especially for elderly patients. However, the long-term prognosis of PTED treating ASD still needs further exploration.

Keywords: adjacent segment degeneration, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy, clinical outcomes, geriatric patients, minimally invasive