论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评估运动员睡眠质量的局限性:中国职业运动员的可靠性和有效性证据
Authors Tan C, Wang J, Lu J, Yin J, An Y, Ye J, Cao G, Qiu J
Received 6 February 2024
Accepted for publication 11 June 2024
Published 5 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2603—2617
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S463289
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Einar Thorsteinsson
Chenhao Tan,1,2 Jinhao Wang,1,2 Jiaojiao Lu,1,2 Jun Yin,1,2 Yan An,1,2 Jinglong Ye,1,2 Guohuan Cao,1,2 Jun Qiu1,2
1Shanghai Research Institute of Sports Science (Shanghai Anti-Doping Agency), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of General Administration of Sport for Exercise Performance Evaluation, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Jun Qiu, Email qiujun@shriss.cn
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the structural validity of the Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) among Chinese professional athletes and examine its test-retest reliability and convergent validity across different timeframes.
Methods: 581 Chinese professional athletes participated. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on the Chinese version of the PSQI. Test-retest reliability was assessed over 2 weeks, 1 week, and 2– 3 days within a 1-month timeframe. Additional reliability analysis over a 2-day interval was conducted within a 1-week timeframe. Convergent validity was assessed using Chinese versions of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ), and actigraphy. A 1-month tracking was conducted, with weekly completion of the PSQI using a one-week timeframe, supplemented by assessments in the second and fourth week using two-week and one-month timeframes. Relationships between weekly results and those over two weeks and one month examined, along with convergent validity, using sleep diary and actigraphy.
Results: The PSQI exhibited a two-factor structure (sleep quality and sleep efficiency), with good model fit (CFI = 0.960, AGFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.925, RMSEA = 0.085). Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for intervals of one week or more (r = 0.721 ~ 0.753). Using a one-week timeframe, the total score and two dimensions exhibited good reliability (r = 0.769 ~ 0.881), but only the total score and sleep quality showed high correlations with ISI and ASSQ (r = 0.701 ~ 0.839). Throughout the tracking, monthly responses correlated well with the most recent weeks (r = 0.732 ~ 0.866).
Conclusion: The PSQI demonstrates a two-factor structure in Chinese athletes, with sleep quality being predominant. Test-retest reliability within a one-month timeframe is unstable, suggesting a one-week timeframe performs better. Distinguishing between the two dimensions, employing shorter timeframes, and incorporating objective measures are recommended.
Keywords: PSQI, athlete, sleep quality, sleep efficiency, timeframe