论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
头孢他唑/阿维菌素治疗革兰氏阴性细菌感染的剂量和输注时间的充分性:PK/PD模拟研究
Authors Han Y, Zhu J , Liu J , Zheng Y, Liang G, Yang Y, Yu L, Yu Z , Han G
Received 17 March 2024
Accepted for publication 26 June 2024
Published 8 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 2823—2832
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S469313
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes
Yun Han,1,* Jianping Zhu,1,* Jieqiong Liu,2 Ying Zheng,2 Gang Liang,1 Yi Yang,1 Lingyan Yu,3 Zhenwei Yu,1 Gang Han1
1Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2The 903rd Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 3Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Zhenwei Yu; Gang Han, Email yzw_srrsh@zju.edu.cn; 3199022@zju.edu.cn
Introduction: Recent studies suggested the potential benefits of extended infusion times to optimize the treatment efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam, which indicated that the current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target may not be sufficient, especially for severe infections. The purpose of this study is to assess the adequacy of dosing strategies and infusion durations of ceftazidime/avibactam when applying higher PK/PD targets.
Methods: This study utilized published PK parameters to conduct Monte Carlo simulations. Different dosages including the recommended regimen based on renal function were simulated and evaluated by the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR). Different PK/PD targets were set for ceftazidime and avibactam. MIC distributions from various sources were used to calculate the CFR.
Results: Multiple PK/PD targets have been set in this study, All recommended dosage could easily achieve the target of 50%fT ≥ MIC (ceftazidime) and 50%fT ≥ CT=1.0 mg/L (avibactam). However, for severe infection patients with normal renal function and augmented renal clearance at the recommended dosage (2000 mg/500 mg, every 8 hours), the infusion duration needs to be extended to 3 hours and 4 hours to achieve the targets of 100%fT ≥ MIC and 100%fT ≥ CT=1.0 mg/L. Only continuous infusion at higher dosages achieved 100%fT ≥ 4×MIC and 100%fT ≥ CT=4.0 mg/L targets to all currently recommended regimens. According to the varying MIC distributions, higher concentrations are needed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with the attainment rates vary across different regions.
Conclusion: The current recommended dosing regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam is insufficient for severe infection patients, and continuous infusion is suggested.
Keywords: ceftazidime, avibactam, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, probability of target attainment