论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
脊柱感染?mNGS结合微培养和病理学寻找答案
Authors Chen J , Liu Y, Huang S, Pang Z, Wei Q, Liu Y, Qin H, Chen Y
Received 26 April 2024
Accepted for publication 5 July 2024
Published 15 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 3025—3034
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S466738
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Sandip Patil
Jiayi Chen,1,* Yonghong Liu,2,* Shengsheng Huang,1 Zixiang Pang,1 Qian Wei,1 Yuzhen Liu,1 Hongyuan Qin,1 Yuanming Chen1
1Department of Spinal Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Preventive Health Care, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Yuanming Chen, Department of Spinal Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China, Email rkyygk@163.com
Introduction: This study evaluates the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing spinal infections and developing therapeutic regimens that combine mNGS, microbiological cultures, and pathological investigations.
Methods: Data were collected from 108 patients with suspected spinal infections between January 2022 and December 2023. Lesion tissues were obtained via C-arm assisted puncture or open surgery for mNGS, conventional microbiological culture, and pathological analysis. Personalized antimicrobial therapies were tailored based on these findings, with follow-up evaluations 7 days postoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were assessed, along with its impact on treatment and prognosis.
Results: mNGS showed a significantly higher positive detection rate (61.20%) compared to conventional microbiological culture (30.80%) and PCT (28%). mNGS demonstrated greater sensitivity (79.41%) and negative predictive value (63.16%) than cultures (25% and 22.58%, respectively), with no significant difference in specificity and positive predictive value. Seven days post-surgery, a significant reduction in neutrophil percentage (NEUT%) was observed, though decreases in white blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were not statistically significant. At the last follow-up, significant improved in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were noted.
Conclusion: mNGS outperforms traditional microbiological culture in pathogen detection, especially for rare and critical pathogens. Treatment protocols combining mNGS, microbiological cultures, and pathological examinations are effective and provide valuable clinical insights for treating spinal infections.
Keywords: spinal infection, metagenomic next-generation sequencing, sensitivity, specificity treatment