Jing Liang,1 Yu Wang,2 He Wang,3 Yu-Hsin Chen,3 Yu-Wei Wu,4 Wen-Jing Yan5 

1College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, 050024, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Education and Psychology, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, 301617, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, People’s Republic of China; 4Student Affairs Division, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou, 325035, People’s Republic of China; 5Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Mental Illness, Affiliated Kangning Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yu-Wei Wu, Student Affairs Division, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou, 325035, People’s Republic of China, Email wyw@wzbc.edu.cn Wen-Jing Yan, Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Mental Illness, Affiliated Kangning Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China, Email yanwj@wmu.edu.cn

Background: Shame-proneness, particularly in adolescence, is a critical psychological construct linked to aggressive behavior. This study addresses the gap in understanding the specific mechanisms of this relationship within the cultural context of Chinese adolescents.
Aim: The study aims to explore the mediating roles of hostility and externalization of blame in the connection between shame-proneness and aggression among Chinese adolescents.
Methods: A comprehensive sample of 1489 Chinese adolescents participated in the study. They completed the Test of Self-Conscious Affect for Adolescents to assess shame-proneness and an aggression questionnaire to measure aggressive behaviors. The study utilized network analysis and mediational analysis, to unravel the complex interactions between shame-proneness, externalization of blame, hostility, anger, and aggression.
Results: The results identified two distinct pathways linking shame-proneness to aggression: one mediated by hostility and the other by externalization of blame. The pathway via hostility was particularly pronounced, marking it as a central node in the shame-aggression relationship. Interestingly, the study also revealed a direct, though less pronounced, inhibitory effect of shame-proneness on aggression, indicating a dualistic role of shame in adolescent behavior. These findings were consistent across different demographic subgroups, suggesting a generalizable pattern in the studied population.
Conclusion: The dual nature of shame-proneness, as both an inhibitor and a facilitator of aggression, underscores the need for culturally sensitive approaches in psychological interventions and future research. The central role of hostility in this relationship points to potential targets for therapeutic interventions aimed at mitigating aggression in adolescents.

Keywords: shame-proneness, aggression, network analysis, hostility, externalization of blame