论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
非结核分枝杆菌性肺病与肺结核相关因素的比较研究:倾向性评分匹配分析
Authors Zhang W, Liu H, Li T, Jiang Y, Cao X, Chen L, Zhou L
Received 5 March 2024
Accepted for publication 20 July 2024
Published 23 July 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 3189—3197
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S467257
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes
Wei Zhang, Haiqing Liu, Tuantuan Li, Ying Jiang, Xiaoyu Cao, Li Chen, Lili Zhou
The Second People’s Hospital of Fuyang City, Fuyang, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Lili Zhou, The Second People’s Hospital of Fuyang City, No. 1088, West Yinghe Road, Fuyang, Anhui, People’s Republic of China, Email zw2314160@163.com
Objective: Investigate the differences in clinical manifestations, imaging features, and associated inflammatory markers between Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease (NTM-PD) and Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB), identify potential risk factors for NTM-PD, and establish a logistic regression model to evaluate its diagnostic value.
Methods: Baseline data were collected from 145 patients with NTM-PD and 206 patients with PTB. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to achieve a 1:1 match between the two groups, resulting in 103 matched pairs. The differences in comorbidities, imaging features, and inflammatory markers were compared between the two groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent influencing factors, and the diagnostic value of the established model was evaluated.
Results: After matching, significant differences were observed between the NTM-PD group and the PTB group in terms of diabetes, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), cystic and columnar changes, lung cavity presentation, and monocyte percentage (MONO%), lymphocyte count (LYMPH#), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (P< 0.05). Logistic regression analysis confirmed that diabetes, bronchiectasis, COPD, and lung cavities were risk factors for NTM-PD. The established regression analysis model was analyzed by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was obtained as 0.795 (P< 0.001, 95% CI 0.734– 0.857). At a Youden index of 0.505, the sensitivity was 84.5% and the specificity was 66.6%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to evaluate the model’s calibration, with a chi-square value of 11.023 and P=0.200> 0.05, indicating no significant difference between predicted and observed values.
Conclusion: For patients without diabetes but with bronchiectasis, COPD, and imaging characteristics of lung cavities, a high level of vigilance and active differential diagnosis for NTM-PD should be exercised. Given that the clinical manifestations of NTM-PD are similar to those of PTB, a detailed differential diagnosis is necessary during the diagnostic process to avoid misdiagnosis.
Keywords: nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease, pulmonary tuberculosis, propensity score matching