论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
针灸治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的有效性和安全性:系统综述
Authors Zeng Q , Liu L , Chen Y, Chen D, Zhou Z, Hu W, Gong S, He B, Qi W, Wang C, Yang Z, Yu S, Zhao L
Received 18 February 2024
Accepted for publication 18 June 2024
Published 26 July 2024 Volume 2024:19 Pages 1721—1739
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S464546
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jill Ohar
Qian Zeng,1 Lu Liu,1 Ying Chen,1 Daohong Chen,1 Ziyang Zhou,1 Wenjiao Hu,1 Siyao Gong,1 Bin He,1 Wenchuan Qi,1,2 Chao Wang,1,3 Zuoqin Yang,4 Shuguang Yu,1,2 Ling Zhao1,2
1Department of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Acupuncture for Senile Disease, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 3Sub-health Management Center, Sichuan Integrative Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu Pidu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Ling Zhao, Department of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, 611137, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 28 6180 0000, Email zhaoling@cdutcm.edu.cn
Background: Acupuncture has been used as an adjuvant therapy for Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) have reported inconsistent results and unknown quality. This overview aimed to summarize the current SRs/MAs to provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of COPD.
Methods: SRs/MAs were searched via eight databases from their establishment to December 31, 2023. The methodological quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Acupuncture (PRISMA-A) to evaluate the reporting quality. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine the strength of evidence. In addition, we also conducted an analysis of the acupuncture points used in the primary RCTs.
Results: Twenty-two SRs/MAs were included in this overview. Based on the assessment using AMSTAR 2, nineteen SRs/MAs were “critically low”. Eight SRs/MAs had a low risk of bias. Based on PRISMA-A, the reporting completeness of eighteen SRs/MAs were more than 70%. As for GRADE assessment, only three outcome measures were of high quality. COPD patients can benefit from moxibustion, acupoint application, acupoint catgut embedding, manual acupuncture, and electroacupuncture, as indicated by effectiveness in measures including lung function, 6MWD, mMRC, CAT, and acute exacerbation. In addition, the efficacy of TENS needed to be further demonstrated. The commonly used acupuncture points in the RCTs include BL13, BL23, and EX-B1.
Conclusion: Evidence from SRs showed that acupuncture is beneficial to lung function, acute exacerbation, 6MWD, mMRC and CAT. For SGRQ and brog scale, acupuncture should be used selectively, but this finding should still be taken with caution.
Keywords: acupuncture, COPD, systematic reviews, overview