已发表论文

血栓弹性成像在接受钬激光前列腺剜除术的良性前列腺增生患者长期抗血小板治疗中的回顾性研究

 

Authors Gu ZB, Qiu L, Zhu H, Lu M, Chen JG

Received 3 April 2024

Accepted for publication 23 August 2024

Published 11 September 2024 Volume 2024:20 Pages 633—639

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S472153

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh

Zhi-Bo Gu, Lei Qiu, Hua Zhu, Ming Lu, Jian-Gang Chen

Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226200, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Jian-Gang Chen, Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, No. 666 Victory Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, Jiangsu Province, 226200, People’s Republic of China, 226200, Tel +862115996558081, Email jiangang_chenC1@126.com

Objective: To compare low- vs high-power HoLEP effects on coagulation in patients on antiplatelet (AP) therapy via thromboelastography (TEG).
Methods: 210 patients was retrospectively analyzed and stratificated into three discrete groups, specifically: Group A (AP therapy, high-power HoLEP, n = 72); Group B (AP therapy, low-power HoLEP, n=73); Group C (no AP therapy, low-power HoLEP, n = 65). Baseline characteristics and coagulation profiles via TEG were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with hematuria. Furthermore, parameters such as IPSS, Qmax, post-void residual volume V2 and PSA levels were recorded during 1year follow-up.
Results: No differences in terms of baseline characteristics across all groups. Significant differences were observed in the duration of enucleation, morcellation, bladder irrigation, post-operative catheterization, length of hospital stay and the extent of hemoglobin reduction (F = 54.06, 8.54, 6.68, 9.24, 17.06, 5.97, p <  0.05). No differences were noted in postoperative hematuria, urine retention, transfusion rates, and SUI (x12 = 1.082 ; x22 =  0.197,; x3=  3.981;x42 =  0.816, p >  0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that prostate volume emerged as an independent risk factor for hematuria (OR 1.080, 95% CI: 1.007– 1.158, p =  0.031). Clinical outcomes including Qmax, IPSS, V2, and PSA demonstrated significant enhancement during 1 year follow-up.
Conclusion: Compared to HP-HoLEP, LP-HoLEP effectively reduces surgical and subsequent processing times, decreases hospital stay duration, and diminishes hemoglobin decline, offering a viable option without discontinuing AP therapy.

Keywords: anti-platelet therapy, BPH, high power, HoLEP, low power