已发表论文

解决经皮冠状动脉介入术后恐动症的最佳证据总结:一项循证综述

 

Authors Ding L, Li C, Chen L, Huang PY, Bian FF

Received 7 June 2024

Accepted for publication 11 September 2024

Published 25 September 2024 Volume 2024:18 Pages 2007—2017

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S481855

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang

Li Ding,1,* Cong Li,1,* Lu Chen,1 Pei-Yu Huang,1 Fei-Fei Bian2 

1Emergency Ward, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Surgical, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Lu, Chen; Pei-Yu Huang, Emergency Ward, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 366 Taihu Road, Taizhou Pharmaceutical High-Tech District, Taizhou, Jiangsu, 225300, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13641589385 ; +86 18705267452, Email chenluchen29@126.com; huangpeiyuh@126.com

Objective: The objective of this study is to systematically explore and summarize the best evidence on intervention programs for patients with kinesophobia following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to provide a comprehensive reference for clinical practice interventions.
Methods: Evidence on interventions for kinesophobia post-PCI was retrieved from Chinese and international integrated databases, treatment guidelines, and websites of professional associations, including systematic reviews and expert consensuses. The evidence considered in this study extends up to May 2022, encompassing information available since the inception of the databases. Two researchers independently evaluated the articles included in the review and extracted and summarized the available evidence.
Results: By extracting and integrating data from the 14 articles included in this review, we identified six categories: pre-intervention assessment, psychological intervention, health education, rehabilitation training, social support, and quality control. A total of 21 pieces of evidence were summarized, including mental health assessment, physical fitness evaluation, timing and content of health education, development of personalized exercise prescriptions, and risk control.
Conclusion: In clinical settings, using evidence-based practices requires developing feasible intervention programs based on comprehensive consideration of hospital resources, allocation of medical personnel, and consideration of patients’ preferences to reduce the kinesophobia of patients post-PCI and improve their compliance with exercise rehabilitation.

Keywords: evidence-based nursing, evidence summary, intervention, kinesophobia, post-PCI